jason-samonds.bsky.social
Neuroscientist and engineer at the University of Texas at Austin. I study neural activity in the visual cortex, especially related to binocular disparity computations.
71 posts
66 followers
170 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
November 27, 2024 was my last one.
comment in response to
post
Fun fact, he also hated peas.
comment in response to
post
What about Ted Nugent and Kid Rock?
comment in response to
post
We needed a Sweat or Williams.
comment in response to
post
So zombie birds?
comment in response to
post
Well, a trade for him would definitely involve that pick.
comment in response to
post
But does it experience the Thatcher Illusion?
comment in response to
post
There is already a bay so how about Lake Wisconsin? This will make even more sense after Wisconsin reclaims the Upper Peninsula to protect their northern border.
comment in response to
post
You should be looking up sailing rather than baseball references. Clearly, you don't know a jack from a sheet.
comment in response to
post
I couldn't find on the website where it says it is satire. It has to be satire? Right?
comment in response to
post
It means, "We're #1!"
comment in response to
post
@bevilconway.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
Do the Vikings defend play action really well or something?
comment in response to
post
12 for 12 to Jacobs, Kraft, and Reed. 3 for 13 to Wicks, Heath, and Melton.
comment in response to
post
Is there any head coaching interest in Hafley around the league?
comment in response to
post
For how much they lack in consistency, they sure are predictable.
comment in response to
post
The NFL is a joke. Once they partnered with gambling, it was over.
comment in response to
post
Pay the fine. Continental is just silly.
comment in response to
post
I mean, with the current state of things, why do we even have laws or judges?
comment in response to
post
You could also say that adults still develop too. In that respect, development in the prism is the continual interaction with the environment.
comment in response to
post
This should be the official logo of C57s. Diversity cannot be stopped.
comment in response to
post
Is there a good free option to store and share photos (albums and not just single photos) that you recommend?
comment in response to
post
They went from 9 wins to 11 wins. They haven't even played in the playoffs yet. They're the youngest team in the league. It's fine.
comment in response to
post
Hopefully, there's still a chance for him. If he tore an ACL though, it's going to be really hard. I think he already is a little slower from his injuries. He's gotten progressively better at catching though (minus the one play).
comment in response to
post
The AJ Hawk tenure was totally solid for a LBer. Z did have a great start. HHCD... Watson is so appealing. It is so easy to see why they drafted him. That Dallas game showed us the potential.
comment in response to
post
I'm guessing you bought Watson jersey? I have a Dillon jersey buried deep in the closet. Sharpe is my only other real jersey. I had a knockoff Reggie one, too, so I don't think I'm cursed. Haha!
comment in response to
post
Hot? They were destroyed by the Buccaneers, barely beat the Panthers, did dominate the Vikings, and then beat the Bears 17-9 at home. I would hardly call that hot. Only the Vikings game suggested they could beat Dallas.
comment in response to
post
They did the one with Love also in the game. I've been dreaming of that all season.
comment in response to
post
It's like as soon as Watson seemed to get over the drops, Reed inherited them.
comment in response to
post
How about against the Steelers in Ireland?
comment in response to
post
Does anyone know what happened when they were showing 20th place crossing the line with 1 or 2 laps to go? Vantourenhout and Sweeck were out front before they cut away and then when they went back, Sweeck was alone way out front and Vantourenhout was in 10th grabbing his leg before he DNF'd.
comment in response to
post
How does the ref not know the rules?
comment in response to
post
Rain + Belgium + Cobbles
comment in response to
post
If you're married and your families are not too far away, you probably do both.
comment in response to
post
I didn't want to do the research, but looks like that would be the case. I just want them to win tomorrow to make sure they're in.
comment in response to
post
Common games as division and conference records would be the same in that scenario.
comment in response to
post
My wife and mother-in-law were talking about their bonuses, and I told them that all I got for the holiday is Musk and RFK planning to completely dismantle the NIH.
comment in response to
post
The power company in Johnson City, TX also sets up something like this.
comment in response to
post
Luck is probably a factor, but they are also very experienced in close games and probably perform at a high level for that one critical drive. It would be interesting to see what their numbers are just for must win drives.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I thought your article showed that the sample size is way too small to draw any strong conclusions, especially when you eliminate that many of the non-attempts were scenarios where the percent gain was very low and pretty much zero coaches (including Campbell) would have gone for it.
comment in response to
post
www.wunderground.com/cat6/Sunrise...
comment in response to
post
We're going to need bigger bins.
comment in response to
post
I missed that, I think. I love darts, so I think I would have remembered that. I remember ping pong being the most intense competition when I was there.
comment in response to
post
Those CNBC journal clubs were still the most epic that I've ever been a part of. Nothing was sacred. Carl simply loved to learn regardless of the topic or skill. I remember teaching him 9-ball at their house.
comment in response to
post
But seriously, LaFleur does make running plays fun to watch.