javo.bsky.social
The Alpha Scientist. Fired from 1900hotdog.com internship for speaking truth to power.
Javo here
286 posts
75 followers
56 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Nuclear launch detected in merritt's followers
comment in response to
post
He literally bought the us rights to the film just to add that scene lol
comment in response to
post
What makes me a troll other than I think you are insincere
comment in response to
post
Not particularly, I think a lot of games handle non traditional resolutions to boss encounters in really clever ways amd thats cool. I just think this particular argument is deliberately worded to drive anger based engagement from the forces that make online discourse unpleasant.
comment in response to
post
I've not said a single insulting thing, I've just been very critical of your premise in plain language which is the very discourse you said you wanted.
comment in response to
post
Then why pick a fight no one is having over a problem that doesn't exist like skipping boss fights. Its not a serious argument that attempts to engage with game design in any thoughtful way. Its meant to get people to link your headline on social media and get mad.
comment in response to
post
Let's be real, you want a million guys with anime avatars called lord kekistan to call you a slur for engagement because you guys gave up on being insightful years ago
comment in response to
post
Anthony Bowens can you ask Tony Khan to buy the pirates plz thank you
comment in response to
post
At what point do you guys at Kotaku just admit your viewer base is toxic angry gamers that you deliberately bait into a rage to the detriment of everyone in the community
comment in response to
post
Are we like Harry potter villains, can we call you Grasstooths and get into wizard battles
comment in response to
post
I just liked the term bloodmouths
comment in response to
post
Bloodmouths
comment in response to
post
Ma'am, dairy queen
comment in response to
post
I kinda wish we drafted Sanders because I am terrified of us signing Rodgers
comment in response to
post
Aw yeah Jon Bois out there talking bout the Shack
comment in response to
post
New Atheism and rationalism suffered from the fundamental structural error of telling people that the outcome demonstrated intelligence rather than the process. They essentially rebuilt faith from first principles replacing "holy" with "rational" as long as fundamental tenets were believed.
comment in response to
post
Lady I stopped taking you seriously back when you revealed the pillar of your entire philosophy is magic
comment in response to
post
Yeah you totally won great work I sure feel silly hoo boy lemme tell ya
comment in response to
post
That sounds a lot like a government
comment in response to
post
You are very bad at reading and most likely thinking
comment in response to
post
It doesn't matter if you don't believe what you are arguing for will happen when it objectively will happen. Vaccine skeptics are arguing for child death even if they don't believe they are arguing for child death.
comment in response to
post
That the natural state of man is cooperative and that society as we understand is a corruption to that natural instinct in order to benefit the powerful over the powerless and that humanity as a whole would be better served by eliminating these institutions and returning to that natural state.
comment in response to
post
I dont even know where to start with how bad of an argument you are making here. Would you like to start with historical, anthropological, biological, or demonstrably obvious
comment in response to
post
No I correctly ascertained you were ignoring the obvious flaws in your philosophy through magical thinking
comment in response to
post
Alchemists believe there is a magic rock that turns lead into gold. It's also something with no basis in evidence and that's why we ignore it.
comment in response to
post
Ok hold on let me gently lay my hands under my chin as you explain how people are trained to participate in a collaborative society without an institutional subordination to the collective.
comment in response to
post
It can't be bad because it's published in a book that doesn't say bad things.
comment in response to
post
I keep using quotes from the text and you don't and it's because you know the text doesn't support your premise
comment in response to
post
Subordination is not subservience. Subordination is placing individual desire as less important than the collective good.
comment in response to
post
You are trying to argue the text doesn't say what the text literally says because you know what the text actually says is more unreasonable than what you personally think
comment in response to
post
Literally says "subordinated to a collectivity"
comment in response to
post
its literally in the text
comment in response to
post
The zine is literally arguing it's a bad thing that schools instill a communal sense of responsibility for the well being of the society
comment in response to
post
what part of leftist politics suggests the individual has no responsibility for the collective well being of the community
comment in response to
post
this book rules because it keeps talking as if things that are objectively good and cool are bad for some reason
comment in response to
post
I feel like you just keep saying words without knowing what words mean