jayaray65.bsky.social
Humanist. Socialist. Pro feminists. UK immigrant (economic/ social). Cricket expert (self assessed). Other labels/ boxes may also apply.
539 posts
237 followers
796 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Humans are woke!
comment in response to
post
What's it got to do with party politics?
comment in response to
post
youtu.be/PT0ay9u1gg4?...
comment in response to
post
Watch the insurance companies.
Who is coverable?
comment in response to
post
He's no Alan B'Stard, that's for sure.
comment in response to
post
Lol.
Leeds over Adelaide.
comment in response to
post
Lol. Man's never been to Melbourne.
comment in response to
post
Any mention of bone spurs?
comment in response to
post
I do hope that Melania keeps and, one day, publishes a diary ...
comment in response to
post
You don't seem to have considered the possibility (mentioned around this thread more than once) that there were people funding this action behind those formally participating - the main purpose not being winning the case
comment in response to
post
The course of Australia's second innings at Lords
comment in response to
post
Califexit
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/jaya...
comment in response to
post
Fewer than 1,500 persons' votes ...
comment in response to
post
That reads like it was written by an AI bot
comment in response to
post
Surely AI will pick the harvest?
comment in response to
post
That neck looks like the Mississippi meeting the Gulf of, er, Mexico.
comment in response to
post
No-one's going to triple-lock the personal allowance!
comment in response to
post
I was once.
When occasionally tempted to start again I just say "Adrian Chiles".
The feeling goes away.
comment in response to
post
Could any of us wokes compete with Farage and Yaxley-Lennon (sp?) in competitive victimhood?
Always projecting.
comment in response to
post
Exactly.
The water supply is a national security issue.
comment in response to
post
The debt can be junked off.
The easiest most supported nationalisation ever.
Failure to do so is simply an unwillingness to govern.
comment in response to
post
Still, nice co-ordinated uniforms - collars undone, no jacket or tie, sleeves rolled up, a little untidy at the waist.
You can't have everything I suppose.
comment in response to
post
AOC v Musk. Bring it on.
comment in response to
post
One presumes he has high-level security clearance?
Those secrets are walking the streets.
comment in response to
post
UK governance - pandering to the misled, ignorant and racists since 2015.
UK economy ...
comment in response to
post
Musk, Theil and the backers of the heritage Foundation didn't pay all that money to get this far down the line to risk the public having a free and fair say.
Putin still has "elections".
comment in response to
post
As with all space/ satellite missile system stories.
What goes around comes around.
comment in response to
post
Apologies, that wasn't a pop at you specifically - more the lack of historical UK political awareness in much of the coverage of this phenomenon.
comment in response to
post
FFS.
Remember all those years we were governed by the SDP?
comment in response to
post
To write those words and not to step back and ask yourself when you became a moral vacuum takes special skill.
comment in response to
post
Thanks, I'll do so later.
comment in response to
post
Because you believe in the rule of law and appreciate that the police and prosecution authority have a job to do?
comment in response to
post
What a strange article.
The headline should have been; "Why I'm jealous of Lineker's BBC salary"
There's little else in there.
comment in response to
post
It was a punny joke. I have no idea about the Green's internal stuff. I hope they are are strong force in UK politics.
comment in response to
post
Is there an article about the danger of Polanski splitting the party with the headline;
Back Zack and crack?
comment in response to
post
Strangely enough, those trousers are right back in fashion (so I am told).
comment in response to
post
May 2023 last article on there. April 2020 first I can see.
I like your writing and subscribe to Byline - I know you left for Desmog, but I first read your work in Byline and just wondered why there was no mention.
Ignore me if you can't or would rather not say.
comment in response to
post
It's bank holiday time,
tacos and wine,
...
comment in response to
post
Hi Sam, why no mention of your time at Byline Times in your substack bio?
comment in response to
post
... there'll be a 251st anniversary celebration and a 252nd ...
When you get to the 260th anniversary celebration and Trump's still POTUS, maybe a democrat will stand up and suggest that something might have gone wrong?
comment in response to
post
"Pushing the boundaries"
Do you lot know any good journalists?
comment in response to
post
... whilst he and his pals partied away ...
comment in response to
post
Well worth a visit!
comment in response to
post
Surely the Shamina Begum precedent applies if they have the right to a non UK citizenship.
comment in response to
post
... with a history spanning back literally decades ...
comment in response to
post
His place in history is secure.
The Conservative Party thought Liz Truss was a better bet than him.
comment in response to
post
TWA TS
comment in response to
post
To say nothing of the inhumanity, it sets an awkward precedent.
Are there any UK citizens with possible other citizenships involved in events in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan ...