jefferz.bsky.social
55 posts
5 followers
37 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
It's easily the best rugby product out there - not sure why it's not more promoted abroad (BBC with no articles on it nor team sheets, though I get the feeling the rugby page is run by an intern doing 20% time)
comment in response to
post
Yeah basically they love whatever they thought it was when they were young, despite it actually being poorer, and now lament a (generally better) society because they got radicalised by Twitter etc
comment in response to
post
There's something very unpatriotic about this new wave of a snarking 'patriotic' class...
comment in response to
post
Did wonder if RFK Jr and his policies would actually be one of the worst cases of actions that exacerbated preventable deaths in history?
That number over the next 3.5 years, mixed with long term legacy, is going to be crazy.
comment in response to
post
What used to be "shaping the message" has become "change the message" - politics via polling and media
comment in response to
post
Media training and government lines are the death of charisma and eloquence
comment in response to
post
There was actually something like this in the Orville - everyone had a social rating and everyone could up/down vote each other - if you went super negative then you had the opportunity to tour TV shows to apologise, but if rating got worse you got executed.
comment in response to
post
You had similar vibes to a meerkat surveying
comment in response to
post
Fixed the problem youtu.be/WboggjN_G-4?...
comment in response to
post
Also it's a very big outlay and these aren't new games either - destined for a slow burn
comment in response to
post
Also if you have a adapter to UK socket, it makes a good temp phone stand
comment in response to
post
Isn't the risk of reoffending an issue of the penal system rather than an issue of the individual?
Also given they will make a minor proportion of those in prison, you have a bigger issue of other criminals reoffending. So fix that.
comment in response to
post
Bulls sharks had more energy than this... Bit of a let down finals series this year.
Wonder if they should go back to destination finals but hard to get the attendance
comment in response to
post
If it continues it feels a bit of a damp squib (especially with the rain) ending for the URC this year
comment in response to
post
If Glasgow don't sign Lancaster jr...
comment in response to
post
Actually that's Tinkerbell smoking a bong
comment in response to
post
"I've been known to support buttering the outside of sandwiches"
comment in response to
post
"5 things a REFORM government would do WOULD SHOCK you", :O!! thumbnail
comment in response to
post
So if dragons get LBB onto their roster they can double their try count
comment in response to
post
Just flip it around and we should get everyone to that level
comment in response to
post
No Candles
comment in response to
post
After reading your book, and seeing councillor salaries, I did wonder if we had more well funded devolution that it might be a better training ground for politicians.
comment in response to
post
Wonder how many Tories will defect to up their chances
comment in response to
post
On a pure seat by seat basis, does this mean parties care more about each seat as none are safe (parties compete harder) - or do they just care less as funding and attention doesn't spread that far (bin fire results with no consistency) ?
comment in response to
post
also enjoy the bit where he seemed to say he did the 90 day reprieve because he didnt like the numbers?
comment in response to
post
Equal representation across podcasts, very woke of you!
comment in response to
post
He should paint model busses
comment in response to
post
wonder if a court could injuct payment to a foreign government? and would el salvador continue to support housing its current detainees if they weren't paid?
comment in response to
post
yeah but as long as you have countless hours of footage of a game and the power of a small country, then you dont need to keep the *checks notes* 3.5mb of data.
comment in response to
post
Sounds like a lot of good will!
Now I'm thinking I can Uber (+cost)/share from work, but my car is now at work so I'll need to get a lift in before, or a lift next day, which is more favours...
Too much planning, and no longer spontaneous!
(This is an introvert's take, so it's exaggerated)
comment in response to
post
Also digital Comms has moved from asynchronous to synchronous (how long do you leave that teams message before you reply, Vs an email?).
Digital meetings can mean more meetings, different tone of them.
Both lead to you wanting to find space to yourself
comment in response to
post
The drink after work is one I often remark about in the context you used to be able to drink and drive... Need to live and work in a city, with good public transport, now for this to make sense
comment in response to
post
Sort of like the free market foreign policy imperialism for the 21st century
comment in response to
post
'Skip Constitutional Costs with this one Hidden Trick They Dont Want you to Know'
comment in response to
post
its going to feed the spampocalypse...
its going to be way, way harder to find anything genuine when you have a continuous spam engine running.
people will then just stop bothering trying to engage in the arts.
comment in response to
post
Assuming the lawyers respect the law, I assume they then resign rather than present the views of their client? Wait for their client to pull some political strings?
Or if smart enough, weave through proceedings with minimal damage and minimal oversight from their client...
comment in response to
post
to 1.5D the chess.. I'm guessing they liked the idea of a fight and egged eachother on, didnt want to upset the boss... now they dont like the consequences of their actions.
they probably want compliant courts, as destroying them doesnt help themselves either
comment in response to
post
and whats schumer going to do in 6 months when they play the same trick again? what concessions did he get for helping?
though in 6 months there might not be much left anyway...
comment in response to
post
A ban on thinking machines!
comment in response to
post
my worry in here is the line on deferring to 'military opinion' and the supreme court deferring to gov..
hesgeth is totally unqualified but now becomes 'military opinion', and then they just appeal it up until they get the deference they want?
wasnt the chevron overturn about removing deference?
comment in response to
post
I did wonder if it'd be a more effective weapon if it was set digitally, fed by a random number generator to a specific window. Update it every three hours or so.
Logistics would collectively lose their minds.
comment in response to
post
same playbook as his department cuts?
claim fraud, break everything then just say woops we can fix back the right things.. end up at 30% of the original system and claim victory.
(then whack 70% of it into tax cuts, bonus is then force dems to have to say theyd raise taxes by that 70%)
comment in response to
post
netflix daredevil was good, though dare devil season 2's punisher legal case was stressful.
reckon a judge would have let a scrappy lawyer outfit rush a mass mass murder case to trial within a month only for half the counsel not to turn to up the trial? :p
comment in response to
post
@samfr.bsky.social a good policy case study - how much do you slow down a policy to bring people with you, or do you move fast and sort of let the 'free market' of behaviour have an upset transient phase you just push though?
Big spectrum of answer though!
comment in response to
post
As fox news hosts audition for jobs in the administration, JD auditions to be a fox news host
comment in response to
post
Ah, royal we I guess!
comment in response to
post
What we?
I'm basically drawing contrast to the wapo story before the election where they tried to pretend bezos wasn't involved, now he's openly trying to use it to promote his views.
comment in response to
post
Where's that editorial independence from the owner now?