jessilt.bsky.social
She/Her. Autistic, non-verbal, lesbian gamer girl. Wrestling super-fan.
Apologies in advance if I say something weird or cringy. Things tend to sound better in my head.
1,543 posts
270 followers
179 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
They do not rule without internal opposition, and that opposition would make it take longer than Trump has.
comment in response to
post
This is, of course, a double edge sword and neither side wants this. But if the SCOTUS were to start violating the constitution, I promise you that this is a thing that WOULD occur.
comment in response to
post
They would rule how they would HAVE to rule. While SCOTUS is appointed for life, they are NOT beyond the reach of the law. All it would take is for congress to create an avenue to remove them, which is within their power to do.
comment in response to
post
The chances of the former happening is remote...but not impossible. The latter, however, is a process that can take DECADES, as each state must debate the ratification process according to their own guidelines.
There is no chance an amendment would be ratified before his term is up.
comment in response to
post
They need more than a bill. They need a constitutional amendment. A constitutional amendment requires 2/3 of congress to approve it, and ratification by 38 states before it takes effect. This is why there have only been 27 amendments to the constitution in the USA's 250+ year history.
comment in response to
post
Nah. If anything, we need term limits in congress, too.
comment in response to
post
If only there had been someone who could have told them that he was a traitor.
Or, like, MILLIONS of someones.
comment in response to
post
And the ENTIRE REASON they created it was to give wrestlers a place where they had input on their own creative.
comment in response to
post
Lol, so no, you got no idea what's going on.
AEW was created by Nick and Matt Jackson, along with Kenny Omega and Cody Rhodes, and TK as the money man. So yeah, they're controlling things. It's THEIR company. 😂
comment in response to
post
LMAO WHAT???
Dude, do you have ANY idea what's going on here? 😂
comment in response to
post
20% is half of what is in normal liquor.
comment in response to
post
Not saying that's what she did. Just saying that you do not need to make contact with someone for your actions to be criminal.
comment in response to
post
Doing something that makes another person fear for their safety is assault. Physical contact is not required.
comment in response to
post
You can see in that video that the cop's first instinct was to put him in a choke hold.
comment in response to
post
To be fair, it is quite an accomplishment to survive one's own stupidity out of sheer, unadulterated luck.
comment in response to
post
I 100% understand this. 🤣
comment in response to
post
And yes, his title run was really spectacular...when he wrestled. Which (through no fault of his own) he didn't do very often.
This is the kind of story that writes itself. Guy can't wrestle so he vacates the title. Then, when he's better, he returns and takes back what is his.
comment in response to
post
Hey, you know what would be a great way to reduce a wrestler's ring workload? Don't give him a belt that he's expected to defend. This isn't a revolutionary concept: it's something they've done with injured wrestlers for as long as wrestling has been around.
comment in response to
post
1) Being pedantic doesn't invalidate my point.
2) They speak of having "read" one because audiobooks are reading. Don't be ableist.
3) Of course they do. The story being real doesn't mean it doesn't have a plot.
comment in response to
post
Roman Reigns is a great wrestler. They just gave him a shitty story (in as much as spending 2 months sitting in his dressing room, twitching his upper lip, can be considered a story) and wouldn't let him actually wrestle.
comment in response to
post
😂
comment in response to
post
WWE hung a belt on Roman Reigns for FOUR FREAKING YEARS because they had no idea where to take the story after giving it to him. Not even Paul Heyman could carry a story for that long.
I wouldn't want ANY McMahon within 1000 yards of where the stories are being written.
comment in response to
post
You missed an "r" in that last word.
comment in response to
post
If I was TK, I wouldn't hire a McMahon to clean the toilets.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
No.
comment in response to
post
They ALL voted for this.
comment in response to
post
I'll believe it when I see it.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but get the hell out of MY kitchen when I'm cooking. You're in the damn way.
comment in response to
post
"Wokery?"
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
All levity aside, though, I have got some fairly extreme mental health issues. I've got some fairly extreme anxiety issues and clinical depression, all of which are exacerbated by PTSD as a result of an extremely violent event from my childhood.
Some books are just not meant for me.
comment in response to
post
I am a 52 year old autistic woman who has at LEAST 3 different, unrelated trains of thought going through my head every waking hour of the day. If my mind was broadened any further, I'd likely have to be institutionalized. 😂
comment in response to
post
Because it was obvious that this guy wasn't any manner of threat to them. That's why it took THREE of them to cuff him.
comment in response to
post
2) It took THREE cops to cuff a man who wasn't resisting in any way whatsoever. And even after they had him on the ground, TWO MORE cops came over to get in on the action.
comment in response to
post
Two things I noticed off the top of my head:
1) The first cop's first instinct was to rough him up. Guy is standing there with his hands behind his back, and the cop unnecessarily drags him to the ground and almost puts him in a choke hold.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I like how this statement makes me feel. 😂
comment in response to
post
You're not a bad person because you're a man. You're a bad person because you treat your car with more respect than you treat your wife with.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Holy crap!
comment in response to
post
Sorry, but "elitism" is reading books you don't like for no other reason than someone else said they're classics.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but when I say this, I get called an idiot.
comment in response to
post
Regardless of what he says now, his actions are what put us where we're at right now.
comment in response to
post
Why regret getting exactly what you voted for?
comment in response to
post
Only 200some more countries to go.
comment in response to
post
Let's not lose sight of the fact that Pence was Trump's trained monkey throughout his first presidency. If he knows this now, he knew it then but choose to keep quiet because he had a seat at the table.
He gets NO points for speaking up after he's not one of the cool kids anymore.
comment in response to
post
I mean, I can think of at least one way... 🤔
comment in response to
post
A book is literally a plot printed on paper. Anything else you can name serves no other purpose than presenting that plot in a way the reader understands.