jibbyjab.bsky.social
30 posts
47 followers
38 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
This felt a bit unfair on Germany. While it’s hard to argue with joint effort to integrate, referencing nazis is brutal, and begs examples elsewhere of “wgat good looks like” - the author only offers an internal Indian comparison. eg. How would India fare when apples and apples, actual immigration
comment in response to
post
soy, corn, cars, meat, oil are their top exports - good luck with that!
comment in response to
post
Isn’t this a “why are you posting this” post itself?
comment in response to
post
ibteresting things happening wih gold since inauguration
comment in response to
post
yeah I can’t see how bonds would benefit from federal mismanagement, treasury meddling and a track record of raising the deficit - the whole point of them is to reflect the reliability of a government. On the other hand, they’ve languished for four years, perhaps they can’t fall further.
comment in response to
post
Go AP. What’s NYT’s position on it?
comment in response to
post
who’d have thunk
comment in response to
post
“wait, you don’t suppose we are the baddies””?”
comment in response to
post
It’s like Risk meets Monopoly
comment in response to
post
that really is a cool idea! Bit of a step back in time but
comment in response to
post
there is no such thing as a career limiting move in the GOP (other than getting on the wrong side of the president)
comment in response to
post
and am still in the dark how tariffs address this…
comment in response to
post
tens of millions of deaths? - there were reportedly only 300,000 since 2015 when fentanyl became a thing, 70% of which were attributed to imports. Prior to that, much came from legitimate, home grown, republican leaning Sackler style oxycontin.
comment in response to
post
Tariffs brought in $600M? Does ge know the market cap and revenues of the company he’s now running (into the ground)? $27Trillion, just the latter. Someone suggested a CEO would not get away with this sort of talk, but I guess the shareholders were already “revolting” in this case.
comment in response to
post
the true mystery is why this sort of obvious narcissism earns him respect. What are people so hungry for that they watch this and think “so kewl”?
comment in response to
post
or that 20% chance your food was off
comment in response to
post
Good ad for RFk brand raw milk
comment in response to
post
What happened to Reagan’s Star Wars… didn‘t Republicans already solve this?
comment in response to
post
I loved “I never understand why he was in charge… he was involved in (research into these types of viruses)”…. Yup, next time get the guy who’s an expert in bunions. Or more likely, Dr Phil and the Brainworm ought to fix it
comment in response to
post
this… brilliant
comment in response to
post
I think he mis-spoke; meant to say, we are a government full of predators
comment in response to
post
Seems like a good trade off, can’t imagine a poorly run pandemic wiping out $200M a year … cough cough.
Gates and Germany (voluntarily) contribute more, this “rip off” stuff is going to come back to haunt
comment in response to
post
it’s the Post
comment in response to
post
hugely ironic because Seth’s opening bitnis about how Trump just ping pongs around the TV rage tweeting about the content. Trump’s litterally TV rage tweeting about being cast as a TV rage tweeter
comment in response to
post
you are confusing US defence spending ($1T)with US spending on Nato ($0.5B). Even including overseas bases, it doesn’t compare with the $0.3T Western European budget… you spend more on nuclear modernisation. You may be correct but how do you conclude Europe is “mooching” off your billions?
comment in response to
post
this is incorrect data. and it is us too
comment in response to
post
is it too late to put him on the moon too, since there’s demonstrsted tech?
comment in response to
post
More “masculine” energy or more “Ali G” energy?
comment in response to
post
Good to see Sorbo is finally getting a regular pay slip
comment in response to
post
Indeed, if he wanted to say “we’re on the side of our allies”, I think its generally acceptable to just … say that… rather than, “uh, we’ll take Greenland whether they like it or not”. What the heck is wrong with journalism