joanna.adeele.io
đȘđȘ đŹđ§ đłïžâđ
đ”: @66.7metr.es
đž: @adeele.photography
đ©âđ» Software Engineer, but I also do...
đž đïž Photography
đ„ Cinematography
đŹ Video Editing + VFX + Colour Grading
đ Graphic + UI/UX Design
đč Music Production + Mixing + Mastering
đ©âđš Digital Art
140 posts
75 followers
110 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
All of what I wrote above in this thread is a batshit insane conspiracy theory, and I DO NOT think any of it has any basis in reality.
But I also know that the only thing we know for certain is that we donât know anything for certain. So, Iâm therefore not ruling it out either.
comment in response to
post
Real life is not a spy novel.
But a clever manipulator knows that fact all too well, and knows how to make use of it.
So wouldnât they?
comment in response to
post
âTrumpâ as a name of a spyâs (or sleeper agentâs/âcicadaâsâ) assumed identity is an absolutely diabolical concept â it would be rejected by an editor as too on the nose to make it into a satirical spy novel.
Itâs Austin Powers levels of parody.
comment in response to
post
trump, noun
a valuable resource that may be used, especially as a surprise, in order to gain an advantage
comment in response to
post
The best place to hide is in plain sight.
Who would suspect a narcissistic businessman who hosted a reality tv show of being a Soviet (and now Russian) spy?
When we look at things in plain sightâŠ
comment in response to
post
Itâs not *as* far fetched and batshit insane when you consider these things.
comment in response to
post
Trump is of roughly the right age to have been sent to the US as a young spy during the cold war.
Remember:
Any document can be forged.
Any photograph can be faked.
Any family history created or identity assumed.
comment in response to
post
The Soviet Unionâs foreign intelligence services were top tier.
Modern day Russia is the successor to the Soviet Union.
Both de facto and de jure.
comment in response to
post
Now, the first of those explanations is entirely sane and logical, and fits Occamâs razor nicely.
The second is a batshit insane take.
But itâs less batshit if we take a look at who we are dealing with on the other side.
comment in response to
post
So why would he still have loyalty to Russia?
The only explanations I can think of are:
1. He is being heavily manipulated into doing and saying these things.
2. His entire childhood and family history is fake itself, heâs Russian and heâs been acting on behalf of Russia nearly his entire life.
comment in response to
post
So, he has entirely free agency.
Except he acts in seemingly nobodyâs best interest, not even his own.
The only one benefitting from all this is Putinâs regime.
comment in response to
post
So why wouldnât he screw over Putin â if it is financial?
And why would he care â at this point â what the compromising information was? Or that there was any?
Anything can easily be claimed as fake in 2025. Compromising information, even in the form of video or audio, is pretty much dead.
comment in response to
post
But â hereâs the thing.
Both of these fall apart due the very same fact that he is now (again) the US president.
That alone means he has more power than Putin.
Trump is a man known for screwing over anyone and everyone in sight.
He also appears to feel no true shame whatsoever.
comment in response to
post
Occamâs razor would have us believe he is simply either being paid off or there is compromising information about him and he is being blackmailed.
comment in response to
post
But the question is â why?
Many have said that he is probably just a useful idiot â incompetence and not malice.
But Hanlonâs razor doesnât really work, for we are (unfortunately) talking of someone capable of being elected the president of the USA.
Therefore, it must be malice.
comment in response to
post
FĂ€nniks on mind ka pĂ€ris raske kutsuda. Kunagi sai kĂŒll kuulatud, aga lihtsalt olen pigem kerge muusikanohik, seda eriti UK ja viimase ~35 aasta osas. :)
comment in response to
post
Vihje âikooniline britpopi albumâ tegi lihtsaks - palju variante just pole, ja see kĂ”lab nagu romantiline komöödia.
Aitas ka see, et olen pub quizâis pidanud vastama kĂŒsimusele âmis oli Oasisâi esimese albumi pealkiriâ
comment in response to
post
âDefinitely Maybeâ? đ€
comment in response to
post
So a regular sleepover then?
comment in response to
post
Would mean you were on your way out already. Which totally tracks tbf
comment in response to
post
Tbh Iâm not entirely convinced it isnât just a piss-take in post-rock either, and weâve all been reading too much into this (or at least I have)
comment in response to
post
I finally absolutely get, why.
Naming #instrumental pieces is hard.
Really, really hard.
So, of course you go by feeling. The feelings you had when you first created the song. Or when you first listened to them.
But feelings are often way more complex than we give them credit for, hence⊠this.
comment in response to
post
And, as one last particularly spectacularly ridiculous exampleâŠ
Red Sparowes:
(âŠwhatever the fuck this albumâs song titles even are â in screenshotâŠ)
comment in response to
post
pg.lost:
âSpirits Stampedeâ
comment in response to
post
God Is An Astronaut:
âAll is Violent, All is Brightâ
If These Trees Could Talk:
âWhatâs in the ground belongs to youâ
âTrail of Whispering Giantsâ
comment in response to
post
Mogwai:
âHardcore will never die, but you willâ
âTo the bin, my friend, tonight we vacate earthâ
âThe Sun Smells Too Loudâ
âIâm Jim Morrison, Iâm deadâ