joshgalperin.bsky.social
Very Serious Law Professor. @HaubLawatPace. Once @pittlaw @yalelawsch @yaleenvironment @VTLawSchool
69 posts
395 followers
282 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Next one will be entirely about vampires.
Museum of Blood?
comment in response to
post
Private governance?
comment in response to
post
The priority deadline is November 22, 2024, but we strongly encourage authors to submit their manuscripts as soon as possible. A limited number of offers are available and will be extended on a rolling basis. Click here for submission guidelines. Please direct inquiries to [email protected].
comment in response to
post
Hawai‘i Law Review is currently accepting submissions for its upcoming Volume, which will be published across two issues in the 2024-2025 academic year. Advancing legal scholarship in Hawai‘i, the Pacific, and beyond, the UH Law Review contributes to the national discourse on emerging legal issues.
comment in response to
post
I'm still figuring Bluesky out. Is there some way I can just auto-follow everybody on this list?
comment in response to
post
Unlike Biden, who is 81, embryos are negative years old.
comment in response to
post
"More is better" is not the same as "more is necessary." 🤦🏽
comment in response to
post
I told myself I wouldn't listen to these arguments. Why am I listening?
comment in response to
post
In any case, the Fed Courts stuff here seems a lot more interesting than the CAA stuff.
comment in response to
post
SCOTUS has often done things most ppl dislike (including things I do like, eg Brown). But is that antidemocratic? I *think* saying SCOTUS is empirically, historically, & structurally antidemocratic assumes going against popular will is itself antidemocratic. I genuinely don't know if I agree.
comment in response to
post
I have nothing good to say about the current court, and I think we're mostly in agreement. But my basic assertion is that being anti or even counter-majoritarian can still be democratic to the extent it provides avenues for different types of engagement in public decisionmaking. (1/2)
comment in response to
post
#SCOTUS isn't antidemocratic. Its antimajoritarian. Its part of the larger democratic ecosystem insofar as it provides an avenue for individual counter-majoritarian contestation, deliberation, and express reason-giving. See, e.g., papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Everything else you say is correct!
comment in response to
post
I'll send you an email when my plans are a little firmer!
comment in response to
post
The biggest difference is that #onhere is like talking into a void. I liked the positive (and I guess negative) feedback on Twitter. But it is nice to see you! I hope life is good. I'll be in NOLA for a night in March. Would be good to say hi.
comment in response to
post
Gosh. Good thing I'm on social media still or I would have missed this.
comment in response to
post
I've just noticed a lot of bad winter weather and a lot of planes with missing parts. But I guess they fly above the weather, so maybe it is nothing to worry about.
comment in response to
post
And what, the two notes are chopped liver?!
Seriously, this article looks great. I'm going to read and I'm going to have questions.
comment in response to
post
This is, indeed, the dream. Well put.