kevinmulhall.bsky.social
Writer | Artist | Retiree from a semiconductor company |
Tech-Economics-Policy-Culture-Cartooning |
No Crypto or Folks selling stuff | No DMs unless I've invited you to it.
Michigan, ex-pat CDN
5,644 posts
9,688 followers
9,604 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Well at least Times says
average was 4.2
Wordle 1,454 4/6*
⬛⬛⬛🟩⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
comment in response to
post
Someone needs to make a charter challenge. If I post a comment which employs a fair use link to provide background to my post, it's ME that's publishing that, not the linked site.
comment in response to
post
Trump is just trying to complete the agenda and the only people he worries about are his base and allies, so he has to keep feeling them red meat outrages to keep the entertained and distracted.
comment in response to
post
Just another typical Trump faux deal, just enough to claim victory. He really doesn't care at all about whether this is right for the US.
comment in response to
post
And I bet they didn't even look for undocumented people doing the housekeeping for their rooms.
comment in response to
post
Hey, that was an inspired choice.
I did more poorly
Wordle 1,453 5/6*
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
comment in response to
post
Tough day.
Wordle 1,453 5/6*
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
comment in response to
post
Just report all R members of congress that don't have anglo names.
comment in response to
post
Mikey is deserting the big guy in his time of need?
comment in response to
post
It's not even like Trump is effective at being evil. He stumbles though all foreign engagements will universally disastrous results. And is a laughingstock around the world.
comment in response to
post
He couldn't have made a stronger argument for replacing R House members in swing states.
Seems very likely there will be a D majority in the House, the big question is can you get a big enough Senate D majority using those seats up in '26.
comment in response to
post
Excellent work Finn.
I messed up today
Wordle 1,453 5/6*
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
comment in response to
post
What we need is to out the exec that decided to fire him.
comment in response to
post
That's great. Pretty sure letting the dog in is against the rules, but good for them.
comment in response to
post
Everytime Trump says that about himself I think, nah, he'd have no idea what to do in a barn full of horses. 😉
comment in response to
post
Shoot, is Sarah saying her law enforcement doesn't go on rampages against their own citizens?
comment in response to
post
Awesome ‪Jacqué! 💥💥💥💥
comment in response to
post
Donald says 55 bigger than 10, must be a good deal.
comment in response to
post
It's all about numbers. No previous impeachment+removal attempt ever had enough Senate votes.
BUT if Ds get large enough midterm majorities in both House and Senate AND Trump continues to trash the general economy, there could be enough R Senators (might only need 5 or 6) to vote to remove.
comment in response to
post
Who is checking to find out how many of these new ICE agents are freed J6 insurrectionists?
comment in response to
post
And no doubt it won't actually secure more of those minerals.
Remember the problem isn't that China is the only place that has rare earths, it's that it's the only nation economically extracting them right now (which is very environmentally awful). We could get those minerals elsewhere and pay more
comment in response to
post
And Carney's working on separating that or at least creating more independence. It's only been a few months.
comment in response to
post
Why the hell isn't the Mayor being questioned about what his police force is doing?
comment in response to
post
Or a wave of Canadian patriotism supporting Canada's independence.
comment in response to
post
Don't you trust Buttigieg more?
comment in response to
post
Reddit is hardly the only place ad hominem laziness and nastiness is discouraged.
comment in response to
post
Clearly we disagree with what a inane nonsequitur is.
My original reply was susinct and specific to your post without resorting to SpongeBob imagery.
comment in response to
post
Ad hominem attacks are the way of X, not Bluesky.
comment in response to
post
Will all the troops have to look over to the podium while they're marching by and salute Generalissimo Krasnov?
comment in response to
post
Looks like the nasty people are leaking in from X again.
comment in response to
post
Will armed riot control squads with their face helmets and tear gas guns be marching along after the tanks and missiles?
Would be nice if somebody ran out in front of the tanks and created a US version of the Tiananmen Square incident to capture on video.
comment in response to
post
Did one of his competitors attend the recent crypto ball after buying a bunch of $TRUMP coin?
comment in response to
post
CiC needs to be removed by other means.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, many Germans who voted in Hitler said that too.
comment in response to
post
Because the Commander-In-Chief threatens their senior officers.
comment in response to
post
I keep FB account mostly to post Wordles and keep on contact with old Friends and Family.
Like X (which I haven't been yo in ages), I hardly know anybody on BS in person.
comment in response to
post
Cracking the glass ceilings of criminality is hardly an accomplishment
comment in response to
post
An unjust dismissal, then. That won't happen here.
comment in response to
post
Blaming Ds for ANYBODY that voted for Trump is purile.
comment in response to
post
Welcomevto BS, Jeff. Dare we ask what silly infraction FB dropped you over?
comment in response to
post
Very overlooked and underrated band.
comment in response to
post
Sorry we're much closer to being North Korea at this point.
comment in response to
post
Trump would say the insurrectionists have with drawn to their secret bases and we need even MORE troops to smoke them out.
comment in response to
post
Trump would say the insurrectionists have with drawn to their secret bases and we need even MORE troops to smoke them out.
comment in response to
post
But that would have to be implemented by the DoJ controlled by the offender
comment in response to
post
How corrupt does someone have to be to let an entire class of criminals go scott free just to obscure the particular crook you want to let off the hook?