kmr-kevin.bsky.social
1,765 posts
491 followers
66 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
No. I will celebrate, but will not even consider, much less make an attempt at, getting anywhere near Trump's body.
I made every attempt I could to avoid getting into view of the White House whenever I was in Washington during his time in office.
comment in response to
post
Is this picture real? Did my dream come true?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Does standing at the urinal in a cinema restroom, next to a notable actor with two films at the festival, count?
(In actuality, I talked with him briefly out in the lobby either before or after this. I hope it isn't really necessary to add that there was no actual interaction at the urinal.)
comment in response to
post
A warning from law enforcement not to attend is ALL THE MORE REASON TO ATTEND!
comment in response to
post
God, I was getting dizzy watching that. Why didn't they use widescreen?
comment in response to
post
Exactly. He is the total antithesis of what his position is supposed to be.
comment in response to
post
Wonder if this will change the format a bit. The show has become too much the "Will Arnett Show". Maybe the focus will go back a bit more to building with LEGO.
I really like the Australian version of the show. Solidly LEGO-focused, with lots of building and technique being shown.
comment in response to
post
*None* of Trump's policies has *anything* to do with solving a societal problem. They are all *only* about increasing his status, power, and wealth.
comment in response to
post
Since the Posse Comitatus Act contains neither the word "arrest" nor the word "detain", I am not convinced. Both of those terms refer to placing someone in temporary police custody.
comment in response to
post
Please, how many more years of appeals before this is *final*?
comment in response to
post
Speaking of Countess du Pres: Grayson Hall, or Barbara Steele?
comment in response to
post
Saw that! 😄
comment in response to
post
Never understood the appeal of bobbleheads, although some of them are kind of cute. (Funko Pops totally confound me. They all look alike to me, and never seem to have any resemblance to the c character they're intending to depict.)
But nice picture, btw! 🙂
Digital or fillum?
comment in response to
post
At least all of the US portion of the funding. I'm sure they'd try to force other nations to cut funding as well, if they could. They certainly have been trying to tell other countries what they can and can't do in other matters.
comment in response to
post
Really? I thought the previous version of the bill *was* retroactive.
comment in response to
post
"Justice" only for the rich and well-connected.
comment in response to
post
Maybe not really an "interaction", I guess, although I do think we made eye contact for a split second.
comment in response to
post
How many more rounds of appeals do they get from this point?
comment in response to
post
But it seems like more and more, it's the single-judge rulings/orders that are the good ones, but they get overturned by panels (and especially SCOTUS).
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure we're going to last a year to make it to that anniversary.
comment in response to
post
To date, this SCOTUS has not found the plain meanings of words, or judicial precedence, to be an obstacle in their way when ruling against the People.
comment in response to
post
Although I'm sure the Seditious Six have already crafted their excuse for granting Trump unlimited, unreviewable control over all law enforcement personnel at every jurisdictional level nationwide.
comment in response to
post
Trump has no concept of how that phrase is meant to be used in normal communications.
comment in response to
post
Wilhoit's law
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
It's an iron law at this point
comment in response to
post
Apart from impeachment & removal by Congress (the slow and effectively impossible way) there is just removal by the VP & cabinet (25th Amendment--a quicker yet just as impossible way).
comment in response to
post
Both wonderful, in their own ways.