Profile avatar
knitdan.bsky.social
Knitter. Cishet he/him. Pro-choice, pro-LBGTQ+. Normie liberal. Rural NE Washington. Elderly man in his 40s. No followbacks without investigating If your profile has no original posts or it’s just a half dozen stock photos I’m probably just gonna block
7,847 posts 889 followers 450 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

are they really going with “the enemy of my enemy should be my rich nazi friend” is that what is going on here

me and the boys on our way to fund as much murder as possible from the good side

laugh all you want but this is what peak rightwing class analysis looks like

Uh oh everyone, the “NYT’s sympathetic profile of a far-right influencer and child pornographer isn’t a puff piece” brigade has logged on They think we’re stupid.

The Harrison Ford Jack Ryan films are peak Clancy cinema, mainly cuz Ford is the most Jack Ryan man to ever live

A former D.C. police lieutenant convicted of leaking information about a police investigation to the leader of the Proud Boys group on the eve of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, was sentenced Friday to 18 months behind bars.

Kind of wild that the New York Times has more sympathy for an influencer who posted child porn than it does for trans children who want to be left alone.

Is there a credulity test one has to take to work at the Times? Some deep psychological screening that proves you’re the kind of person capable of believing it’s clear someone posted a screenshot of child pornography he watermarked was “for the lulz”? Or is it just a coincidence you’re such rubes?

So at what point does it become legitimate (morally, practically, if not strictly legally) for states that are the targets of this focused attack to withhold federal taxes as much as they’re able?

Really wish you assholes would stop posting alleged screenshots of obviously fake X or Truth Social posts.

You cannot make me give a shit about Trump admin and right-wing social media personalities infighting

If you’re Dom Lucre, you can apparently share hideous child sexual abuse material to millions of people for profit, with your watermark on it, and the New York Times will let you get away with saying you meant well and that the backlash was an “ordeal.”

Local library is starting a knit along project which I think is overly ambitious because they’re offering 3 projects ranged from beginner to intermediate to advanced. Just from the yarn and tools list, I can tell the advanced one is going to be a shitshow so I’m absolutely not doing it.

People say they want small market teams to do well in the NBA but I haven’t paid any attention to the Finals because fuck the state of Indiana on principle and fuck OKC for stealing our team.

As near as I can tell, the only Democrats currently saying anything about "embracing" Musk are themselves two techie-affiliated chuds on the fringes of the party, so maybe lets not throw bacon grease on something that isn't even a fire.

if your website has ads i consider those to be part of your website and when they’re scams i avoid your website because it’s a scam website

The editorial position of the new York times is obviously TERF Don't be cowards and just admit it

begging pundits to listen to a single actual democratic campaign instead of the version of the democrats that RW propaganda invents

this story is just a great illustration of NIMBY nihilism. at core, these people have no vision for anything. they simply oppose change for the sake of opposition. (i also think there is an element of death denial here — if i can prevent all physical changes i can deny the reality of my mortality)