lculibrk.bsky.social
PhD Bioinformatics @UBC - Bioinformagician @NYU Grossman/Perlmutter. I like climbing pointy things and clicking virtual polygons for fun
9 posts
13 followers
34 following
comment in response to
post
I see you've committed the grave crime of *checks notes* being a woman on the internet.
comment in response to
post
Maybe keywords in the title triggered some kind of additional checks behind the scenes given the climate around billionaires right now
comment in response to
post
Favorite example of this was Smith-Waterman in Geology. I believe the anecdote was that they were incidentally walking by a local Geo meeting and saw poster presentations describing the problem, and realized that it was just another application of sequence alignment. The story is all hearsay though
comment in response to
post
If you're trying to cluster one underlying truth with two different methods, as long as both methods _can_ reach the same defensible answer, does it matter? Correct me if I'm wrong but you're describing how methods can be wrong, which is separate from different methods giving different answers
comment in response to
post
As a not-scRNA person, is this something that happens when one uses defaults and calls it a day? Can parameter tuning of clustering bring the results in line with the expected/observed biology or are they simply wholly incompatible? As I understand it, scRNAseq analysis is quite iterative
comment in response to
post
KSP2's history is a constant repeat of "and then it got worse"
comment in response to
post
Fighting over 2nd place while data.table looks on from the top of the podium?
comment in response to
post
Considering how many prescient things they did predict, it's not a bad track record though. It makes sense they'd expect brainwaves to be decodable far more easily than in reality
comment in response to
post
Terminals are actually terminal WHAT