lennarthilbert.bsky.social
Studying the cell nucleus in search of inspiration for future DNA computers. Systems Biology professor at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, post opinions mine alone.
hilbertlab.org
252 posts
2,156 followers
791 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Ah, yes, that makes sense!
comment in response to
post
Rebuild?
comment in response to
post
16 minutes đ
comment in response to
post
âŚ
Do not let these questions restrain or trouble you
Just point yourself in the direction of your dreams
Find your strength in the sound
And make your transition
Make your transitionâ
comment in response to
post
Thatâs close competition there
comment in response to
post
Die ePA an sich ist ein dramatischer Fortschritt fĂźr unser Gesundheitssystem.
Aber prädiktive polizeiliche Ăberwachung psychisch Kranker durch gesetzlich ungeregelten Zugriff auf medizinische Daten? đŽâđ¨
Quelle 6: patientenrechte-datenschutz.de/nach-dem-ans...
comment in response to
post
Ob das die ganze Antwort ist? Vermutlich nicht. Momentan Ăźberbieten sich ja alle in Hass und AnkĂźndigung rĂźcksichtsloser MaĂnahmen, und es scheint Resonanz zu finden - also, genau der Punkt, den Sie benennen.
comment in response to
post
Es gab einmal diesen Moment, wo die SPD vor vielen Jahren gesagt hat âdie Agenda 2010 war ein Riesenfehler, wir sehen jetzt zu, dass alle sicher sind!â Sonntagsfrage +5% in einer Woche. Wäre eine Antwort gewesen, haben sie aber nicht dran festgehalten :-/
comment in response to
post
Ich hatte gehofft, dass noch das âWas wir daraus lernenâ kommt, weil mich exakt diese Fragen auch umtreiben. Ich habe bisher keine guten Antworten gefunden.
comment in response to
post
Ah well, at least now you arenât getting lost in between 300 new followers per day ;-)
And most of the old follower network actually cones back in no time here, the old Twitter vibe is back Iâd say
comment in response to
post
Hi, great you made it here, welcome!
comment in response to
post
In the end, for a thesis where everything else is really good, and formatting inconsistencies are the only real problem, I still give it a perfect A!
In my experience, though, sloppy preparation and sloppy logic/analysis tend to go hand in hand.
I agree: one should read the full MS. Of course.
comment in response to
post
Yes, I would also think that journals with publication fees should take over such editing tasks. Many do edit and check references, to be fair.
On the other point: I also try to keep a most tidy lab space. Dusting and empty benches work miracles for safety inspections, even if totally inconclusive
comment in response to
post
Ja, Chat GPT hab ich fĂźr akademische Aufgaben schnell sein gelassen. Aber definitiv dann gut als Demo, wie es schiefgehen kann! Vergleich ist auch eine super Idee! Danke!
comment in response to
post
Was die Fehlinterpretationen angeht, wäre ich neugierig, welche KI das falsch versteht. Wenn es um sehr präzises Verständnis der Literatur geht, wechsle ich häufig von Perplexity (top bei generellen Aufgaben) zu Consensus, da es auf Auseinandersetzung mit Originalliteratur spezialisiert ist.
comment in response to
post
Also, ich finde das Beispiel hier gut. Es zeig, wie man mit KI auch in der Lehre offen, proaktiv und konstruktiv umgehen kann. In meiner Wahrnehmung haben sich viele Kolleg*innen auch rasant in diese Richtung bewegt, von ganz jung bis kurz vor dem Ruhestand.
comment in response to
post
So, yes, I go by the same rule:
If you are sloppy with your references, especially if it is in a way you would have caught it if you looked even *once* at the output of your software, I must assume you do the same when you manage and process data, or plan your experimental controls.
comment in response to
post
To note, one of the authors who checked before is me, so if I am finger pointing, I am pointing at myself.
The mistakes here are the hard-to-catch type: journal abbreviations and capitalizations, erroneous page ranges...
More common ones are author initials inconsistent, page range formatting...
comment in response to
post
Welcome on this platform Christof and lab!
comment in response to
post
Lastly, IG in the first post should be IF, for immunofluorescence
comment in response to
post
And because max projection is sometimes hiding things in the DNA channel, here a mid-nuclear section of the DNA channel, it shows the cell cycle progression much better.
comment in response to
post
Here is a screenshot with full label, transparent background going to black gets me every time on Blue Sky...
comment in response to
post
The images are maximum z projections over stacks of full nuclei, recored with 100X TIRF super-resolution lens, with our automated correction collar back in action. It shows so much in the final image quality, absolutely worth the investment!
comment in response to
post
Doppelseitiges Tesafilm. Wir haben es dann im BĂźrokatalog gefunden, kĂśnnen also doch geregelt im Rahmenvertrag bestellen :-)
comment in response to
post
Itâs extremely disappointing, even though itâs not surprising
comment in response to
post
â¤ď¸
comment in response to
post
Der Screenshot zeigt tĂśdlich VerunglĂźckte, oben ist 2023, dann geht es runter zu den Vorjahren. NatĂźrlich ist jeder Verkehrstote einer zu viel, aber ich fand diese Statistik auch selber positiv Ăźberraschend: die Anzahl Verkehrstoter nimmt mit den Jahren ab.
www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Ge...
comment in response to
post
Verkehrstote insgesamt pro Jahr in Deutschland sind knapp weniger als 3000
www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pr...
comment in response to
post
Wow, I remember our own lab opening with cutting a ribbon, like it was yesterday and, at the same time, a hundred years ago. Much success!
comment in response to
post
B-roll material from manual dechorionation
comment in response to
post
We recorded some videos of the sharpening of more tweezers. Hope to have something soon :-)
comment in response to
post
Oh, thatâs amazing! Will forward right now :-)
comment in response to
post
Grammatical mistake in the query is on the house, same for the extra line of space left over from copy-paste :-)
Plus, I had to remove literature references from the consensus.app response, as we are allowed only 20 papers, and they were already used up.
comment in response to
post
đ
comment in response to
post
Looks like a roll cage on top of the confocal