libyauprisingar.bsky.social
👀LOOK👀:
Election Anomalies Compilation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1whdbN8U3JPQ3mcMhyA8XJt8YDmF9mPQ10t8asNdlrWI
🎵@ dharmikamusic.com
Streaming- "Dharmika"
Archived:
Libyan revolution- libyauprisingarchive.com
Standing Rock- Nodaplarchive.com
468 posts
3,454 followers
4,842 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I shared this 2 yrs ago!
youtu.be/y16SZhZJHkI?...
comment in response to
post
Here's a compilation of election anomaly resources and links from the 2024 election, for anyone who wants to look into this further: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
comment in response to
post
Here is where This Will Hold goes into detail on the statistics. I still would like to hear from other statisticians, and, not being one, more explanation, but it's the most detail I've seen. open.substack.com/pub/thiswill...
comment in response to
post
Right? If the preponderance of votes in those areas were Democrat B4, then .5 is an overabundance of caution, whereas our concerned R5Philly says that the popularity of trump means that 5 is too low. It also doesn't much matter, because it's the forensic graph data that to me is most damning.
comment in response to
post
I will let you know when I catch up on my reading and have questions.
comment in response to
post
If you know other statistical people who have the clarity to make simple clear rebuttals, I am certainly curious, but I know there's a lot of people with statistical experience that see their work as valid in bringing up concerns, and for now, I do too.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I look forward to having the time too to look at Mebane's paper and your responses, but I really do have a busy summer. Meanwhile, the drop off graphs and other anomalies have been enough of a concern and make enough sense to me for now that it makes sense to me to keep looking into this.
comment in response to
post
He keeps popping up, so at some point I hope to have enough information to respond to his actual arguments. But I do not have the time or the statistical expertise at this point to dive in. My main goal is just to continue collecting people's research, including people's rebuttals. No harm in that.
comment in response to
post
I am curious about this statistic. Jive and Nathan don't seem to focus on it in any ETA work, except in passing. Do you know who has done the work on this statistic about the counties flipping? Just curious about this one, as well as the statistic of the likelihood of winning seven swing states.
comment in response to
post
Yeah I'm not exactly spending much time on it. I'm just curious. Thanks. If I make it through Mebane's paper and his rebuttal at some point, I will see what makes sense to me. I understand about the bomb threats.
comment in response to
post
At some point I hope to be able to have the time to read Mebane's paper, and if I manage to understand it, read this person's counter-arguments and try to grasp them, but at this point, I don't know enough. I did include their rebuttal on my compiled document for others to view. What's their flaw?
comment in response to
post
I'm traveling a lot this summer and do not have the statistical expertise to respond, nor have I had the time to even read Mebane's paper, if I even would understand it. What I have done is put your threads up in my compiled document, along with Mebane's and ETA's work in the Pennsylvania section.
comment in response to
post
Can you clarify? I have not been able to figure out what to say to this person because I don't have these statistical know-how to respond.
comment in response to
post
And when you hear that song
Come crying like the wind
It seems like all this life
Was just a dream...
comment in response to
post
Also who's going to rake the forests? Aren't they deporting all the forest rakers? Oh right, they just want to pave them over and build private prisons on them. Good times! 😡
comment in response to
post
I don't swear very often, but, fuck that.
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
I found this info about how to know if one is chatting with a bot. They suggest Crazy Ivan’s to test. Very interesting.
lifehacker.com/how-to-tell-...
comment in response to
post
Well apparently he can't; hopefully he doesn't feel a need to bomb Iran because of it.
comment in response to
post
Exactly! Lizard people?