Profile avatar
louiscapet.bsky.social
law & medicine, prev govt servant, bon vivant C'est une maxime bien essentielle dans le gouvernement, de prévenir que les peuples ne tombent dans une sorte d'indifférence qui leur fasse penser qu'il est égal de vivre sous une domination ou sous une autre
71 posts 217 followers 566 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Aw deleted, lame
comment in response to post
Which businesses prioritize providing public shelter and restrooms over paying customers, or even equivalently to paying customers? Sounds like an interesting concept!
comment in response to post
i think it is really strange how many of you responded to those posts — which were just observations about cooking at home — as a personal attack or a lecture about your behavior. if reading a short post about being economical with food drives you into a rage, that’s your issue, not mine
comment in response to post
That I can agree with!
comment in response to post
Imagine a maga fairness doctrine where every npr story must be balanced by something trump’s bureaucrats decides provides necessary balance etc etc.
comment in response to post
I can definitely imagine a Department of Misinformation run by Trump that would be way, way worse. This is the problem with vague, vibes-based hot takes that never get fleshed out into policy details. It’s the same nonsense Trump does with his policy “concepts” - not super helpful.
comment in response to post
Imagine how maga would weaponize that one! Would be a nightmare.
comment in response to post
How would you accomplish that dismantling? What entity will decide which platforms and pipelines will be dismantled and what criteria will they use? Are you worried about that entity being taken over by those on the other side and used for nefarious purposes?
comment in response to post
Ok!
comment in response to post
It’s fair to point out when people are clearly misreading something, as you are here. My comment about hallucination was in reference to critics of a descriptive statement about AI, who clearly read-in a lot of normative content that was not in the text.
comment in response to post
Enjoying it!
comment in response to post
Seems like someone should come up with a description of a logical fallacy where you attack not what someone said, but who they are
comment in response to post
It’s weird how all of these educated people can’t understand the difference between descriptive and normative statements/conversations. The original post didn’t argue that a diy solutions manual was a good thing, but all the faux outrage just hallucinated (wink wink) such an argument.
comment in response to post
No I don’t do that. Was a fun chat!
comment in response to post
Nah I wouldn’t say that.
comment in response to post
Idk, Americans? People who don’t want Trump torching the constitution, people who don’t want Maga fascists to win more elections
comment in response to post
Yep
comment in response to post
This is not how we are going to win elections.
comment in response to post
lol so angry - social media has broken so many people, or at least elevating broken people to sad little stages on which they perform their brokenness.
comment in response to post
I can see attempts at collective guilt pretty clearly. A winning strategy, to be sure.
comment in response to post
I’m glad we live in a society where blaming individuals for the decisions of the majority of their race / skin color is usually not viewed favorably!
comment in response to post
Yeah I think the control of spam is a major issue. Incredibly annoying.
comment in response to post
And it’s even more than that though. You have accept that you don’t know what you don’t know, and that there are, as Donald Rumsfeld infamously observed, unknown unknowns. That’s where the real trouble hides.
comment in response to post
This is wild
comment in response to post
Statecraft as soulcraft.
comment in response to post
That’s literally what he wrote — it’s a smokescreen.
comment in response to post
Well as they say, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Bon appétit in 2025!
comment in response to post
How is that relevant?
comment in response to post
So weird how you make this about me. Get help.
comment in response to post
It’s not about me actually.