ltpowers.bsky.social
609 posts
39 followers
39 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Good lord.
comment in response to
post
You have a weird definition of "just".
comment in response to
post
But who tells them which orders are illegal?
comment in response to
post
They haven't been trained to think for themselves.
comment in response to
post
Logic
comment in response to
post
This looks cool. I can't think of any reason it needs to be VR, though.
comment in response to
post
"Pluto is a planet. Salt is bad for you. Or maybe not."
Not great examples. "Planet" is an arbitrary designation; what changed is not our knowledge but rather our definition of "planet".
No one ever said salt was bad for you. Salt, like most nutrients, is essential -- in the right dosage.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, seems like putting statutory rape of 16- and 17-year-olds in the "pedophilia" bucket along with child molestation and forcible rape just serves to muddy the waters.
Just like calling adolescents "children" isn't really all that helpful in other contexts, either.
comment in response to
post
She'd probably rather stick with Mushu's smiling porridge.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Uh, what's wrong with that Best Buy?
comment in response to
post
Then we get Peter Thiel as shadow president instead of Elon Musk. I'm not sure if that's an improvement.
comment in response to
post
I had the After Dark TNG edition. (Probably still have the floppies, though at least one of them is dead.) Not enough Wesley Crusher though.
comment in response to
post
So, if you don't immediately realize that this headline must be false, then you're a conspiracy theorist. And also it takes three days to verify the information. And also you're an idiot if you don't take three days to verify the information, or if you don't just move on because it's clearly dumb.
comment in response to
post
That's like a couple years old.
comment in response to
post
Where were these voters last fall?
comment in response to
post
I was dimly aware of CAD at the time but never read it regularly.
comment in response to
post
The fact that a Trump voter wants me to know that they did not vote for mass deportations is not interesting to me. What is interesting to me is what they plan to do about mass deportations, and I hope the answer isn't "I plan to ask you to assure me that I'm a good person."
comment in response to
post
That doesn't make any sense.
comment in response to
post
He did mention the "German and Jewish" scientists.
comment in response to
post
He corrected himself in the clip.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure how we can reliably do that without knowledge of the other person's circumstances. I can take educated guesses, but I don't usually know if the other person had a rough childhood or brain damage or watches Fox News.
comment in response to
post
Demand action from whom?
comment in response to
post
Moreover -- and this is part of What's Wrong With Politics, too -- certain people see others' public choices as implicit rejections of all alternatives.
Like if you choose to get married in a courthouse, you're somehow saying that church weddings are bad.
And people react badly to that.
comment in response to
post
Okay, I get it, but at the same time, I don't post anything unless I intend to invite discussion on it. Do other people post stuff just to ... I don't know, see it in print?
Now, if the debate is about something tangential, yeah, that's annoying.
comment in response to
post
Well, sometimes it's mystifying. And if I try to ask others for insight it usually doesn't go well.
comment in response to
post
Can we at least try?
comment in response to
post
While it'd be nice if DVDs converted Line 21 captions into subtitles, shouldn't the blame here be on the HDMI standard? Captioning data should be included in that standard if it's intended for video output.
comment in response to
post
If there's one thing I'll never understand, it's why conservatives are so vehemently against doing anything to save energy.
comment in response to
post
I mean, isn't everyone one stroke or heart attack away from collapsing?
comment in response to
post
Sure, though I don't think Disney is the worst of them by any means, especially in news media.
But yes, there is a significant difference between a monopoly and an oligopoly.
comment in response to
post
Trouble is, I can't find any reference to the headline quotation in the article, nor in the CBS News article to which it links. And the CBS News article doesn't say anything about BlackRock, either.
www.cbsnews.com/news/unitedh...
comment in response to
post
Man that was a hard news article to find. It's on Medium. medium.com/@hrnews1/bla...
comment in response to
post
They own a lot of things, but to be a "monopoly" they have to have very little competition.
Disney has lots of competition. In media, from CBS/Paramount, NBC/Universal, Fox News, HBO Max, Dreamworks, and countless movie studios.
comment in response to
post
What does Disney have a monopoly over?
comment in response to
post
Six corporations doesn't seem like a monopoly. More like a hexapoly.
comment in response to
post
No, because plenty of Democratic voters don't care either. The vast majority of the American populace is too stressed/busy/apathetic to pay attention to everyday corruption like this.
comment in response to
post
Yep, turns out all of our safeguards assume that the 99% of the people running them are ethical. Once you get a critical mass of corruption, there's no stopping it.
comment in response to
post
Sure but I bet you already don't vote for Republicans.