lysthecat.bsky.social
32 - She/Her
9 posts
57 followers
116 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to
post
Looks like one of the things the bill defines what is "harmful to minors" as:
Lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.
It's like they slipped this in amongst the other more general definitions of porn. That's seriously fucked, lol.
comment in response to
post
Well I definitely agree that kind of age verification is inherently really flawed and way too restricting. I see how the "harmful to minors" precedent can be irresponsibly used for political means. That perspective helps me, thank you for the nice reply.
comment in response to
post
What does SCREEN ACT have to do with banning anything? This bill is trying to get "porn sites" (I get it, vague) to have more robust age verification (which is a dumb premise but still not your point). I looked at the bill text and it doesn't seem to mention anything else. Genuinely confused.
comment in response to
post
@dogsquirt.ing did all of the amazing sketchies with purple backgrounds, thank you I adore you ;w;
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post