main-user-no-1.bsky.social
My Aesthetic, drawing, culture archive
I stand for liberalism , feminism and democracy 👭👫🌍👬🧑🤝🧑🌈
🏹And
against authoritarianism, fascism, patriarchy
186 posts
110 followers
88 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Fascism is the cultural struggle 'state' to establish an authoritarian centralized system against individual rights, and global liberalism has statistically strengthened individual rights and democracy.
comment in response to
post
You still haven't answered my question. How can a communist economy prosper over a liberal economy?
comment in response to
post
A centralized planned economy works in the early stages of a country. But we are not in the early stages of a country. Control of the free market in developed countries just leads to inefficiencies.
comment in response to
post
So you're a fascist defending the disappearance of the global liberal order and the retreat of global human rights and individual rights by the expansion of authoritarianism in Russia, China.
comment in response to
post
Wow, now you're going to define Korea's entire nationality with your fingers in your room. White people deserve to determine the fate of other nation and races and ethnicities. great.
comment in response to
post
I'm still waiting for an answer btw. How can a communist economy function much better than liberalism?
comment in response to
post
👏 Yeah, you probably know better than me about the 4b movement and korean culture. What a genius.
comment in response to
post
Korean people want the U.S. military to be on the Korean Peninsula. Attempts to ignore their choices and unify perceptions of a ethnic, or nation, with certain religious or radical beliefs simply lead to racism. and it's simply not good for them.
comment in response to
post
Now you proves my original point that you are a racist
comment in response to
post
Yep. That's a great statement.👏
comment in response to
post
Oh yeah, you probably know better than me what Korean history was like before America came to Korea. What do i know.👍 keep doing a good job
comment in response to
post
🤣🤣🤣
comment in response to
post
Growing up rapidly in the early stages is a universal phenomenon in the development of a country. The growth rate decreases as a country develops. It is not because of the miracle of communist Jesus. It happened in s.Korea, too.
comment in response to
post
Based on statistics, liberalism has improved wealth, welfare, life expectancy on a global scale, and reduced poverty, but it's probably my imagination.
comment in response to
post
If I break the principle of universal notions and establish a hypothetical premise, I can also create hundreds of theories about society.
comment in response to
post
Hehe monky
comment in response to
post
So how do socialist and communist economies work, and how do they bring about the improvement and efficiency of wealth, welfare, rights, etc. on a global scale as much as capitalism and liberalism?
comment in response to
post
🤭
comment in response to
post
And you say we have to subvert society with that imperfect experimental argument. It's just a crazy fascist argument. No one says for over hundreds of years how the communist economy actually works🤷♂️
comment in response to
post
In fact, leftism, such as Marxism, is the main culprit for undermining trust in science and institutions by denying the entire Western society on which ideas are based, that is, weakening democracy and spreading fascism.
comment in response to
post
Just because you have an organ and body doesn't mean you function as a human.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, and that's why the Chinese Communist Party denied Einstein's theory.
comment in response to
post
Who recognizes organs?
comment in response to
post
Then ask global South citizens what is better, liberal protection or authoritarianism lol
comment in response to
post
Yeah, it's not a universal truth, it's a framework. Honestly, the framework can be done by anyone.
comment in response to
post
Capitalism has a historical tendency to break down authoritarianism, like feudalism, and to continually strengthen individual rights. Yes. If we look at the past and present, we experience hierarchy. But it doesn't define capitalism or liberalism.
comment in response to
post
No. Because I simply don't agree with your premise. And you make me a Nazi with the fact that I disagree. Smh
comment in response to
post
You're more focused on attacking personality than arguing. I don't want to live there if this is the vision presented by a communist society.
comment in response to
post
I'm not buying your bible sorry😉
comment in response to
post
If the whole theory is shaken just by discussing the room it's probably a very poor theory lol
comment in response to
post
You say liberalism within capitalism that you define yourself is contradictory, and you like to explain the whole definition of it, but you don't make any self-criticism about whether the definition is based on universality. and that's what make you religious.😔
comment in response to
post
So what all philosophers have said is no doubt true? Is it the critical thinking you claim to blindly believe in it? Newton drank mercury.
comment in response to
post
In order to build a room, we need the idea of envisioning a space.
comment in response to
post
Marxism borrows Hegel's dialectic to make arguments like material, class, and history, and that's the fact.
comment in response to
post
And Yeah, and that's the world we're living in. Our world develops on the basis of hypothetical ideas like laws and institutions, democracy, deals, agreements etc. not through material-based controls.
comment in response to
post
Dialectics is about the confrontation of discourse for truth establishment. The materialistic view of history is the historical interpretation system advocated by Marx and Engels. And it borrows dialectical methodology.
comment in response to
post
If you don't have the ability to explain yourself, don't talk like you understand.
comment in response to
post
Leftism, which wants to delete individual rights and achieve control over individuals through state monopoly capitalism, is very deeply related to Nazism.
comment in response to
post
I learned from leftism, and that's why i learned from best
comment in response to
post
Yeah, moral principles and consistency are important, then the same would be true of Stalin and Chinese communism, which slaughtered tens of millions.
comment in response to
post
And I rely on what I know, I don't rely on other people's ignorance to say I'm right 🤭 And I don't have a strong belief in what I don't know and the consequences that I can't control.
comment in response to
post
And I'm not one who is irresponsible enough to push a theory that is not certain and untested into a movement.
comment in response to
post
At least I have the honesty to say that I'm not sure about what I'm not sure about. That would be one of the first attitudes required for debate.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure but apparently Kant and Hegel focus on methodologies for finding objective universality, but do not define dogmatic methodologies that involve subjective perceptions such as class as universality.
comment in response to
post
Too bad, apparently having the principle of expression is considered WOKE DEI in the current political climate.
comment in response to
post
I'm gonna watch rick & morty ohh jeez
comment in response to
post
I see a MAGA Christianity right here.
comment in response to
post
Then Marxism can be sorted out at the Rick & Morty level.
comment in response to
post
According to the philosophy that human consciousness is determined by material conditions, the classification of humans into class units based on whether or not they possess means of production.
comment in response to
post
He claims that all matter has two sides to it, but since an object is a collection of various components, subjectively distinguishing it as a whole creates a wide range of scientifically inaccurate interpretations. Therefore, it only brings chaos to the quantitative and objective order of reality.