martinla2z.bsky.social
285 posts
169 followers
455 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Usually this is all the identity they have. Ditching this would require to face whatever other situational plight that was tolerated. Apply freely anywhere.
comment in response to
post
and also you’re not their therapist- I’d like to know more. you’re right as cisgender male it’s also tiring to know that this is still a problem, but what truly mystifies me is the root of it - inherited cruelty? denial of societal change? hegemony hard-on? hugs and good vibes!
comment in response to
post
right!!
comment in response to
post
I've written four animated features. This is the first one to have WGA coverage. Credit protections, health & pension, residuals, the works. More studios should take Laika's lead. Writers want to work at places that value them.
comment in response to
post
I saw this one-sheet for the first time in the Enciclopedia del Cine from Ed. Planeta. Family has it somewhere.
comment in response to
post
Why were you nervous? Has this happened before? What was the rationale? I mean, you're paying -whoever this is - to help you. If, as a friend, I wouldn't shun anyone for who they are, it's hard for me to fathom a professional doing this. Or do they stop treatment and don't tell you their reasons?
comment in response to
post
He so wants to leave his own party, but he’s not a five year old anymore.
comment in response to
post
☝🏻shorter and with more guts- the way democrats used to talk before big donor straight laced candidates
comment in response to
post
I’ve had similar experiences! Here are three comparisons I ran:
comment in response to
post
by the by... where's nancy and our better dems who never defended forcefully, then drip drip couldn't back a perfectly competent president who didn't pal around with enough rich donors, missed a step and misspoke here and there but didn't call that 'the weave'?
comment in response to
post
His mouth is a tariff on comedy
comment in response to
post
We're the New York Times, dammit! If ever - only if - we would never apologize in the first person, sir!!
comment in response to
post
Kotkin 101: they were chosen because none could overshadow him or gang together to replace him. Yes, unlikely, that’d be unconstitutional, but that fact doesn’t compute with him.
comment in response to
post
“Buried deep in the text of the more than 1000-page Big Beautiful Bill is [Section 70302] a measure to restrict the federal courts’ authority to hold officials in contempt if they violate court orders.”
www.thedailybeast.com/hidden-threa...
comment in response to
post
I don't have one but I wonder if having it led to anything.
comment in response to
post
👆🏻bingo. corrupted by years in cahoots with big donors, selecting bland candidates, promoting virtual signal issues, abandoning rural voters, no overall vision to make sense of bread and butter issues - it gets you w, then the freedom caucus, then trump
comment in response to
post
You know what was nice?
Our old forgetful president who could at least remember we're a Constitutional Republic.
comment in response to
post
star search… but to have a stupid fight with and hitch on their coattails
comment in response to
post
Never, as long as he gives good content
comment in response to
post
The rise of demagogues is a sign of general grievance - against everyone. They could’ve rallied behind Biden and had the soul searching later but today’s elites are too detached to notice.
comment in response to
post
Also Dems were able to elect a visibly declining FDR and got the Truman presidency to boot. What did they know, amirite?