michaelmechanic.bsky.social
Mother Jones writer/editor; author of "Jackpot," an "entertaining and eviscerating" (Jane Mayer) book on America's wealth insanity; piano player turned punk rock drummer turned old-time fiddler; dad of Gen Zers; gardener; curmudgeon about town.
1,836 posts
13,547 followers
825 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
But Sec. 112021 raises a comparable 1.4% tax up to 21% for the colleges with the top endowment/student ratios. Princeton is #1—Harvard actually falls beneath the top tier. It's not necessarily a bad policy, but it's being done for the wrong reason: to punish higher ed, and given everything else...
comment in response to
post
Yes, and also a lot of downsteam costs to the economy. All the money they "save" by defunding NIH/NSF research, for instance, will have devastating economic and social ripple effects. Ditto the attacks on higher ed. The mind reels.
comment in response to
post
Exactly!
comment in response to
post
Right, but GOP is always saying govt should run more like a business, and as this former IRS chief told me, no business would deliberately sabatoge its revenue arm.
comment in response to
post
Sure, I think something like that could potentially help level out some of our inequality problems. Would all depend on the details, of course.
comment in response to
post
pardon the misspelling!
comment in response to
post
Because a) most people have few assets to spare, b) GRATs were created by accident (modeled on CLATs, which also are a problem) and c) US laws should penalize the transfer of dynastic wealth, not provide vehicles for tax avoidance by the richest families, and is the opposite of meritocratic.
comment in response to
post
I don't know what this poser is talking about. The women in my life communicate pretty damn directly.
comment in response to
post
Derangement?
comment in response to
post
Right. It's transparently f'd up.
comment in response to
post
This could make for some incredible satire
comment in response to
post
Hey, we should touch base again soon re nonprofit world.
comment in response to
post
Well, it extends what is now in place—AND adds to it. I was calculating from the status quo.
comment in response to
post
As a former scientist, I appreciate you using "titrated."