msrubyscarlet.bsky.social
Polycrip: AuDHD SPMS, INTP, Ace, Feminist, "Hard Left"ist, wide awoke, Author, Artist and part-time Libertine. Views my own, but everyone is entitled to my opinion 💋
2,960 posts
1,991 followers
1,306 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Murderers? Drivers who killed someone? GBH offenders? Drunk drivers that didn't kill someone (yet)? Ppl who robbed old ladies? Muggers? Wife beaters? Animal abusers? Burglars? Pimps? Scam artists? Anti-social types who make their neighbours lives miserable? Fly tippers? Litterers? Vagabonds?
comment in response to
post
What about non-dangerous sex offenders, or dangerous non-sex offenders?
Where is the line?
comment in response to
post
Ssh, or I'll tell everyone about the Samson Directive.
comment in response to
post
Right now looks more like Iran flattens the Israeli ethnostate, the 'Israeli' settlers pack up and run away (home on their other passport), and Israel tries to start WW3 out of spite.
The majority of the WORLD want violence to end in the ME.
It's up to Israel how they want that to be achieved.
comment in response to
post
You support blaming a violent aggression by a rogue state, enacting a genocide, starving children and conducting daily aid massacres, illegally holding nuclear weapons and openly threatening to use them to start WW3 on the country (the latest of many) that they attacked, unprovoked?
Deluded.
comment in response to
post
The good reason being what, that Israel managed to steal the technology and build a bomb and Iran didn't?
The most belligerent, violent, aggressive, expansionist, racist, supremacist state in the world has nukes it doesn't admit to, or allow inspection of, and it threatens to use them.
Good faith?
comment in response to
post
BTW, look up the Samson Directive.
AKA the 'we will take you ALL down with us' policy that Israel has - they openly pledge to end the world through unprovoked nuclear attacks, not only on neighbours, but on Western allies/sponsors, if it feels its not going to win.
But Iran are the problem. Sure.
comment in response to
post
Iran is a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. It is a member of and co-operates with the IAEA. It is regularly and voluntarily inspected.
The US confirm Iran have no nukes nor any program to acquire one.
Israel has c 400 nukes, won't allow inspections and has a 1st strike policy.
comment in response to
post
The definition of terrorism is violently attacking civilians in the hope that it will prompt political change (ie regime change).
Exactly what Israel is and has been doing in Gaza and Iran, openly and admittedly, to try and force regime change.
They are terrorists. They HAVE nukes.
But thats OK?
comment in response to
post
Israel’s defence minister said on Thursday "Khamenei... gives the order to fire on hospitals.... Such a man can no longer be allowed to exist."
Katz has been bombing Gazan hospitals for 18 months and assassinating, starving and immolating thousands of Gazans, a third children.
Can your hypocrisy.
comment in response to
post
She already is a war cirminal.
And in law, so are you. Anyone who supports, facilitates, funds, encourages or fails to act against a genocide is by definition guilty of genocide themselves.
ie a War Criminal.
Do you feel good about being guilty of genocide?
Does it make you feel important?
comment in response to
post
Meantime, though. Who has actually attacked who?
Who has bombed the others nuclear and infrastructure facilities?
Who has assassinated the others peace negotiaters?
Who has attacked civilian populations in five different neighbours in the last 5 years?
Who actually has nukes?
Not Iran. Israel.
comment in response to
post
Iran thinks a belligerent, ethnostate intent on territorial expansion, that operates an apartheid regime and is currently conducting a genocide against the native population of the land it is colonising and occupying is a problem?
Lots of people do. Israel is THE problem in the ME.
comment in response to
post
You did attack them. Yes.
You did assassinate their negotiators, and their scientists, yes.
So it's amazing that they don't feel safe with a belligerent, nuclear capable neighbour who repeatedly and frequently attacks its neighbours and cries victim any time one of them responds...
Would you?
comment in response to
post
Israel doesn't threaten, no it actually DOES fully destroy its neighbours. Gaza, Beirut...
You didn't stop Iran from getting nukes. They are signatories to the non-proliferation treaty. Unlike Israel, who actually HAVE undeclared nukes and won't let weapons inspectors in.
comment in response to
post
Tell that to Gaza.
comment in response to
post
A rogue nuclear state bombing Iran is not a diplomatic solution.
Israel have taken dramatic, illegal steps to avoid negotiation for decades - assassinations, invasions, chemical weapons. They are the ones attacking neighbours unprovoked.
But you think Iran is the problem?
comment in response to
post
Meanwhile you have a huge arsenal of big bombs and guns that you don't admit to, and you don't allow inspectors in to look at what you have and are doing.
And you're attacking a neighbour you've been saying is about to buy a gun for thirty years, even though he has none and you have many.
comment in response to
post
Israel is attacking Iran.
Iran has the right to defend itself.
Try to be consistent at least.
comment in response to
post
Which might have happened, if Harris wasn't standing on a platform of 'shut up, the status quo is fine' and 'yes, we will continue to pay and arm Israel to immolate children in Gaza because they pay for my private campaign jet'.
I can't understand why ppl weren't enthused by that to vote Democrat.
comment in response to
post
Continue funding and arming genocide.
That was the policy she committed to.
Obviously you liked the sound of that policy, since you voted for it. Blood is on YOUR hands. The blood of 200,000 Palestinians, AND the blood of Americans who will die under Trump.
Because YOU didn't say NO to genocide.
comment in response to
post
We didn't think Trump was better, we didn't vote for him either.
But we also didn't think 'Liquidising infants is fine, as long as nothing changes for me personally'
like you did.
comment in response to
post
What isn't true?
You voted for a WAR CRIMINAL.
KNOWING she was complicit in genocide.
You criticise others for not doing the same.
And then insult them because you think it will stop people noticing that:
YOU VOTED FOR A WAR CRIMINAL TO CARRY ON KILLING BABIES WITH YOUR TAXES.
It didn't work.
comment in response to
post
Sorry, what about what he said isn't true?
Did Biden not arm and fund a genocide for 14 months?
Is Trump not continuing to do so?
Why your obsession with people's genitals? Is it to divert attention away from your support for the mass murder of children, paid for by your taxes?
comment in response to
post
On what basis are you making the claim that Kamala (who said she was committed to unconditional support of Israel, no matter what, and refused to even allow a Palestinian to speak at the DNC) would have saved 'thousands of lives'?
Or even ANY lives?
She committed to continue arming the genocide.
comment in response to
post
That may have been true in the USA, it most certainly was NOT in Europe.
Of the literal millions who marched through the European capitals opposing the war, most were aged over 55.
comment in response to
post
The perpetual pushing of the scrounger narrative vs understanding that PIP is an in work benefit irks me. And reducing Access To Work is insane given govt obsession with only working people being deemed worthy members of society.
comment in response to
post
It is not a separate life until it can survive without being literally a part of someone else's body.
Any more than the thousands of "human lives" swimming about in your testes at any given moment.
comment in response to
post
What human life? There is only one human life involved and that is the life of the pregnant woman.
If you consider cells with human DNA to be human life, then we're all mass murderers for cutting our toenails, and having surgery to remove a cancerous tumour is murder.
A fetus is not a human being.
comment in response to
post
Good job nobody is suggesting you do, or legalising infanticide then.
comment in response to
post
There is still a limit. The only difference now is that a woman who has a late term miscarriage won't get treated like a murderer because her pregnancy failed.
comment in response to
post
Who do you think decides, after 6 or 8 months of pregnancy, to have an abortion?
Is it something you think someone does just for fun?
Or because they feel like it?
Or they change their mind about wanting a baby?
Listen to yourself.
comment in response to
post
Nobody wants to 'kill babies'. The 'baby' is free to go live somewhere else, nobody's stopping it. Women ask for the choice to allow that 'baby' to live inside their body, or not.
If the 'baby' can't live outside the woman's body, then it's not a baby, it's part of her body.
HER body.
comment in response to
post
Discrimination lawyers for constituents of Labour MP Sadik Al-Hassan may be interested in asking why he is hiding comments questioning transphobic govt policy and delivery failure.
comment in response to
post
Surely the NRA have protocols for this sort of thing, isn't it like, their reason for existing or something?
comment in response to
post
I love the way they 'march' completely out of time and step with each other, when we KNOW they are more than capable of precision coordination.
Fantastic "Fuck you, Sir", good job soldiers :)
comment in response to
post
I just love how they are 'marching' entirely out of time and step with each other, when we ALL know they're perfectly capable.
What a "fuck you Sir", it's wonderful.
comment in response to
post
Don't you understand? We can't afford to have disabled people any more, even though social security spending is still the same ratio of GDP it was fifty years ago, it's no longer sustainable.
How can we cut billionaires' taxes if we have to feed all these cripples?
Hard choices, etc.