Profile avatar
norocel.bsky.social
🇫🇮🇸🇪 #Firstgen AssocProf at #Lunduniversity former #MSCA IF #ULBruxelles I use #intersectionality in 💻 #extremism & #radicalright #populism #welfarechauvinism #criticalbigdata #criticalAI
120 posts 3,272 followers 1,252 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
But both parties furthest away from SD in that constellation w/h conservative M & Cristian democrat KD. Uncertain whether a liberal electorate wants to endorse such formula especially when SD doesn’t actually need them more than just ideological trophies. (4)
comment in response to post
In turn agrarian liberal C just forced its leader Demirok to resign, who previously tried to align party closely to social democratic SAP. Unclear if next leader pursues this line, or joins L & other centre right parties in mainstreaming SD. C is presently also under threshold at 3,8% (3/)
comment in response to post
Sister parties in Northern Europe have face similar challenges. In 🇸🇪 conservative-liberal L is spending fast all its previous liberal credentials away by flirting heavily w/h radical right SD that props acting government. Polls put party securely below threshold at 2,5% (2/)
comment in response to post
Χρόνια πολλά 🎂! Grattis 🥂! Alles Gute zum Geburtstag 🎊!
comment in response to post
Congratulations, I look forward to reading it. Not to mention the timing, well done 👍!
comment in response to post
Last session had a diverse lineup of speakers (Riya Raphael, Alison Gerber, John Wedderburn) talking from their own personal perspective & career stage abt. ”Academic trajectories within & without academia” 5/
comment in response to post
Second session saw Bibi engaging Ines Bramao & Daiva Daukantaité on the topic of ”Exploring unique considerations for the mental health of PhD students” 4/
comment in response to post
First session had @dlheidenblad.bsky.social speaking insightfully abt. how to ”Do less, do better” in combining academic scholarship, popular science outreach & personal life 3/
comment in response to post
Together w/h Bibi Imre-Millei & Mia-Marie Hammarlin I have worked for abt a year planning for this event w/h ambition to center PhD students concerns to convey & demystify diverse trajectories in/outside academia 2/
comment in response to post
This is absolutely outrageous. Also several other people commented on the choice of words in this context noting the obvious bias.
comment in response to post
Solidarity Aurélien!
comment in response to post
May I also be added to the list please 🙏
comment in response to post
May I also be added to the pack, please 🙏.
comment in response to post
Lovely crust, enjoy!
comment in response to post
Thank you for this, excellent idea! 💡
comment in response to post
The thesis monograph may be accessed at this link
comment in response to post
I would also like to be added to the list 🙏
comment in response to post
Excellent news, congratulations! Felicidades 🎉!
comment in response to post
Stort grattis 🥳 !
comment in response to post
Unfortunately Constitutional Court’s demand for a recount of votes for recent presidential elections is going to just add oil on the fire. These parliamentary elections may turn out a bloodbath for the 2 political poles: surface thin social-democratic PSD and allegedly liberal but conservative PNL
comment in response to post
Freie Demolierte Partei sounds just about right, both concerning the political dynamic, but I suspect also when it comes to what might await them at the ballot box 🗳️.
comment in response to post
May I also be added to the PolSci starter pack please 🙏
comment in response to post
You should never trust Duolingo to lift your spirits.
comment in response to post
Interestingly, it was the diaspora that seem to have tilted the result in favor of Lasconi. Ciolacu received close to 1,769 mil. votes, but little from abroad.
comment in response to post
So results seem to indicate a wider trend whereby pollsters are not conveying correctly voting preferences. But even so this is a big surprise.
comment in response to post
What does this mean? No candidate w/h chances to qualify in runoff has a progressive agenda (sexual&reproductive rights), some worse & pro-Russian (Simion) than those timidly talking abt. minimal social justice (Ciolacu) or riding a tired anti-system agenda (Lasconi) or executing orders (Ciucă) 7/🧵
comment in response to post
(Delayed, battery low) & Ciucă (PNL, conservative right) competes as standard-bearer of outgoing president Johannis. Former military & suspected of plagiarism he does not raise up to charisma of previous contenders, but delivers social conservatism packaged into pro-European neoliberalism 6/🧵
comment in response to post
Lasconi (USR, former anti-system now conservative liberal) competes to be first woman to qualify to run off. Former journalist & local politician, she flirts w/h socially conservative electorate (she supported 2018 anti-LGBT referendum; derided gendered violence) & argues being anti-(PSD)system 5/🧵
comment in response to post
Simion (AUR, far right) w/h rabidly nationalist & revisionist but 🇷🇺-friendly agenda also socially conservative may pinch second place to runoffs, provided far-right electorate mobilizes voting (AUR polled second in EU elections). Unclear how much of previous support from diaspora he can hope for 4/🧵
comment in response to post
Thx for the Q. Romanian diaspora has mainly voted right-wing & even far-right candidates in elections. So the PSD candidate may get fewer votes that the polls say
comment in response to post
Ciolacu (PSD, social-democrats) w/h a socially conservative & timidly redistributive agenda seems best positioned runner off, but PSD candidates have constantly lost presidency since 2000 elect. Negative campaigning lifts up corruption & (still) communist legacy. Diaspora rarely votes for PSD 3/🧵