peterhense.bsky.social
#NAFOfella | Litigator | data, tech, AI | co-host RegInt: Decoding AI Regulation | AI Act Compact: https://shop.ruw.de/AI-Act-Compact/978-3-8005-1960-6 | Passionate about politics, history, animal protection | Loves Rome & The Simpsons | Threema: YTN9VR2P
827 posts
4,463 followers
7,575 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Alter. Puh.
comment in response to
post
This always amazes me ! Russian cancer metastases again 35 years later...
comment in response to
post
RFK ist Sadist, das hat ja seine Verwandtschaft detailreich geschildert. Andere sind ihm egal. Er tötet gern, bislang meist Tiere, nun auch viele Menschen.
comment in response to
post
Hauptsache sie selbst - die werden sich impfen, so wie RFK auch.
comment in response to
post
www.adweek.com/media/meta-a...
comment in response to
post
8/n Germany enforces some of the strictest hate speech laws in Europe, particularly concerning content that glorifies Nazi crimes or advocates violence against minorities.
comment in response to
post
7/n which states that the platform has done nothing to comply with the DSA in this respect,” he said.
The ads also likely violate German national laws governing hate speech and Nazi-era propaganda.
comment in response to
post
6/n Peter Hense, founder and partner at Spirt Legal, told ADWEEK that Meta and X have made no efforts to address these risks and are thus in violation of the DSA. “X published an audit report issued by FTI, [...]
comment in response to
post
5/n civic discourse, and public security, among others. Article 35 of the DSA obliges platforms to implement “reasonable, proportionate, and effective mitigation measures tailored to the specific systemic risks.”
comment in response to
post
4/n The failure to remove these extremist ads could put both Meta + X in breach of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which came into effect in 2022. The DSA holds platforms accountable for spreading illegal content and mandates that platforms assess and mitigate risks to fundamental rights, [...]
comment in response to
post
3/n thereby fulfilling the German constituional principle of "Wehret den Anfängen (resisting the beginnings) and "Nie wieder" (Le'olam lo od, Nigdy więcej, mai più, never again, plus jamais).
comment in response to
post
2/n Section 130 of the German Criminal Code, "incitement of the masses," is designed to act hashtag#preemptively against direct violations of human dignity and to counteract the emergence of a historically proven dangerous momentum, [...]
comment in response to
post
1b) and why failing to remove or block these ads violates not only the #DSA but also established criminal laws prohibiting the spread of Nazi propaganda in Germany.
comment in response to
post
I have no clue, honestly.
comment in response to
post
Then the US under Trump would have capitulated even quicker.
comment in response to
post
Lets continue with the general events. A bold claim by a Finnish MEP. bsky.app/profile/noel...
comment in response to
post
The article reported that a former senior Soviet KGB spy chief claimed Donald Trump was recruited as a spy by Russian intelligence 38 years ago and given the codename “Krasnov.”
We are not confirming its validity, only pointing out the unusual nature of its disappearance.
comment in response to
post
Ask the last Auschwitz survivors what they saw and then grow a spine.