profhutchinson.bsky.social
Social Justice Advocate
Professor @Emory Law
B.A. Penn, J.D. Yale
Dad of 2 Black Labrador Retrievers
64 posts
1,511 followers
351 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
It's more than disinformation. This is a sign of in-group panic. Dominant groups fear they are losing their "liberty," because civil rights/equality/equity is a zero-sum game. This fear is often reflected in gross overestimation of the subordinate population. Character limit makes this brief
comment in response to
post
I read this quickly, but it seems like this would prevent federal grants for research on systemic racism or other forms of inequality. This issues are important generally, but have become critical in health-related research.
comment in response to
post
It applies to entities receiving federal funding (they cannot use federal funding to pay for DEI/CRT/Intersectionality, Gender training.
1. Won't pass now
2. Could pass later (horrible)
3. Issues are 1st A, Eq. Prot., statutory civil rights, and best practices for public and private sector.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I appreciate you!
comment in response to
post
Is MTG leaving the House?
comment in response to
post
Glad to find you here!
comment in response to
post
If people make nuanced and fact-based arguments, this shouldn't be a problem. The greatest stumbling block in today's political discourse isn't ideological bubbles or hateful people. It's data-free analysis. And we can "both sides" this one--but more so on the GOP side.
comment in response to
post
If people make nuanced and fact-based arguments, this shouldn't be a problem. The greatest stumbling block in today's political discourse isn't ideological bubbles or hateful people. It's data-free analysis. And we can "both sides" this one--but more so on the GOP side.
comment in response to
post
LOL! To leave hate speech and bodily threats, not politics.
comment in response to
post
I don't -- because these issues intersect with class. Black people, for example, see class struggle as inseparable from class struggle. If antiracism only means "do not discriminate" w/out substantive equality, it is bankrupt. Also, racism is a leading factor why whites oppose soc welf policies.
comment in response to
post
Yes!!!!
comment in response to
post
Could I recommend @profmmurray.bsky.social , @hvaloche.bsky.social and @profhutchinson.bsky.social (all law profs) ?
comment in response to
post
Ok, this should be fun! LOL.
Sarcasm/Dog dad/80s crackpot humor
comment in response to
post
Thanks for following. So glad I found your here.
comment in response to
post
Google "Social Dominance Orientation." It's real.
comment in response to
post
Jones was strident before Alito
comment in response to
post
Thanks for this list. I'd love to be added.
comment in response to
post
The state of Texas could easily sue in Austin.
comment in response to
post
Go figure.
comment in response to
post
So many of them will not question Trump. This additional piece is awful.
comment in response to
post
Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, and Social Justice.
comment in response to
post
His work is amazing! It influenced my thinking on pluralism in institutional leadership and societies.
comment in response to
post
Not in the medical profession, but conversant in health disparities matters and really intrigued by psychiatry and psychology. Happy to follow.
comment in response to
post
Amen to all of the above!