Profile avatar
profpaulpoast.bsky.social
International Relations and Foreign Policy. UChicago Prof. Chicago Council Fellow. WPReview Columnist. Still on Twitter/X, but now here too. https://www.paulpoast.com/
874 posts 7,003 followers 118 following
Prolific Poster

This week's @wpr.bsky.social column wasn't about illustrating general IR concepts, so much as it was about addressing a pressing current issue. But I did draw a bit from some of my recent research on alliances, primarily NATO specifically. Specifically...

This week's @wpr.bsky.social column wasn't about illustrating general IR concepts, so much as it was about addressing a pressing current issue. But I did draw a bit from some of my recent research on alliances, primarily NATO specifically. Specifically...

The first of a two-part reflection on the US relationship with Europe (with next week focused on Ukraine). The US isn’t abandoning NATO

The relationship will change, but the US isn't abandoning NATO. My latest for @wpr.bsky.social.

A whirlwind week left observers writing the trans-Atlantic alliance’s eulogy. But the US, even under Trump, isn’t interested in abandoning Europe or NATO, @profpaulpoast.bsky.social writes.

The relationship will change, but the US isn't abandoning NATO. My latest for @wpr.bsky.social.

IR Book of the Week! "The Market in Global International Society" by Barry Buzan & Robert Falkner. If states are in a society, rather than an anarchic system of autonomy, that society is underpinned by global markets. Merging of IPE & English School IR.

If the War in Ukraine did nothing else for Russians, it convinced them that Russia is Great Again. Data from recent @global-affairs.bsky.social & Levada survey.

I think Trump will soon have his "Tucker Carlson Moment" (i.e. realization that Putin has a weird-history obsession with Ukraine)

This draft agreement of Trump w/Ukraine, giving US control of ~50% of Ukraine's natural resources, is an example of @profpaulpoast.bsky.social claim that Trump is a 19thC president- I could see USG demanding this from say a Latin American country in 1890s. www.telegraph.co.uk/business/202...

How many troops should Europe commit to Ukraine? What role should they take? As Dan Reiter and I argued a few years ago, don't rely on mere "tripwires". When it comes to forward deployed troops, go big or stay home.

How many troops should Europe commit to Ukraine? What role should they take? As Dan Reiter and I argued a few years ago, don't rely on mere "tripwires". When it comes to forward deployed troops, go big or stay home.

ICYMI: Trump is an enDOGEnous shock to the international system (h/t @yusufimaadkhan.com)

For those wanting me to elaborate on these points, I'll do so in my next @wpr.bsky.social column.

As someone with a forthcoming book on NATO, I particularly like hot take #2 ;)

My "Munich Security Conference" Hot Takes: - Europe will be fine. - The US isn't abandoning NATO. - Current Ukraine-Russia status quo will likely be final agreement outcome.

International Relations Concepts Illustrated in my latest @wpr.bsky.social column: - Levels of Analysis - Polarity and System level Explanations - Status seeking by declining states Overall argument: Trump is the result of a return to multipolarity (& worries over relative decline).

"Imposing tariffs, making threats and seeking territory are all things we would expect from a state that perceives itself as losing status on the international stage." Why Trump doesn't matter, in @wpr.bsky.social.

It’s critical for observers of international affairs to not overstate Trump’s specific impact, @profpaulpoast.bsky.social writes. Despite his best efforts, Trump can only steer US global leadership in the direction it was already going: down.

Some see Trump as a threat to international order or the cause of US decline. Others think he will make America "great" again on the world stage. Such views give Trump too much credit. He's more symptom than cause, as I explain in my latest for @wpr.bsky.social

Actually, you can shoot values Or, more accurately, be motivated by values to shoot

IR Book of the Week! "Cooperative Complexity" by @rickyclark.bsky.social. International Organizations facilitate cooperation between states...and increasingly other international organizations. Such "scaling" would seem efficient, but that's often not the case.

Some are reading the below remark by Hegseth as de facto US abandonment of NATO. I don't see it that way. First, he also said he expects the alliance to "endure for generations to come". Second, I see the remark as saying, "the US wants to focus on China"

Hegseth isn't wrong. I've long thought the outcome could be more a "frozen conflict" along existing battle lines, rather than a return to pre-2022 (let alone pre-2014) borders

Nationalism is a powerful force. Survey data from @global-affairs.bsky.social & Levada show growth in "Russian Pride" over time. Most notable to me are the rise, since the early post-Cold War era, of pride in Russia's "political influence in the world" and "economic achievements".

It seems my lasting legacy, thanks to @merriam-webster.com, is to be forever associated with the word "disputatious"

It seems my lasting legacy, thanks to @merriam-webster.com, is to be forever associated with the word "disputatious"

What was that old saying about professionals and logistics?

- Exit a global climate change agreement - Impose steel tariffs - Obsessed with national building in the Middle East Is it me, or did Trump find the George W Bush playbook?

“we live in a world more like the 18th and 19th centuries, not the superpower rivalry of the Cold War.” That statement wasn't by Trump or Rubio. It was John Kerry, when he was Obama's Secretary of State. Gives a different perspective on Trump's "19th Century Presidency" fascination.

“we live in a world more like the 18th and 19th centuries, not the superpower rivalry of the Cold War.” That statement wasn't by Trump or Rubio. It was John Kerry, when he was Obama's Secretary of State. Gives a different perspective on Trump's "19th Century Presidency" fascination.

"focusing on Trump’s actions against foreign aid misses a larger point. Arguments for giving humanitarian and development aid...have never held much sway in U.S. foreign policy." ICYMI: My latest for @wpr.bsky.social

"focusing on Trump’s actions against foreign aid misses a larger point. Arguments for giving humanitarian and development aid...have never held much sway in U.S. foreign policy." ICYMI: My latest for @wpr.bsky.social

THE 👏 NATIONAL 👏DEBT 👏DOESN’T👏WORK👏THAT👏WAY👏

Need a case study for when "realpolitik" and "idealpolitik" point in the same direction? Then look at Foreign Aid.

Stated differently, the Project 2025 folks are nearing the “find out” stage

International Relations Concepts Illustrated in my latest @wpr.bsky.social column: - Soft power - Prestige - Role of values in world politics Overall argument: Current actions against USAID just latest in a long history of foreign aid not being a major priority for US policy.

Regarding the NIH funding cuts to universities: this is why I have long held that College sports, particularly football, matter. Get ready for the reactions in the great states of Alabama and Ohio when their respective flagship universities say, “well, I guess we need to close up shop”

"Giving aid might be what is done by the leader of the free world, but not if that leader would rather be left alone." Key argument in my latest for @wpr.bsky.social

"Giving aid might be what is done by the leader of the free world, but not if that leader would rather be left alone." Key argument in my latest for @wpr.bsky.social

A few thoughts on this: (1) shutting down USAID and ending humanitarian assistance aren’t the same thing—watch to see if/how much assistance starts back up in coming months; (2) one impact will be to demonstrate to anyone sensible (leaves out many) how much bang there’s been for v US little buck.

The latest accusations (and conspiracy theories) leveled at USAID highlight how US foreign aid has long been an easy political target. My latest for @wpr.bsky.social.