proximus228.bsky.social
I am an abolitionist of abortion. I believe abortion goes against the founding principles of America. I hope to have a civil debate with people on this topic.
187 posts
43 followers
162 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Sure, why is it not murder?
comment in response to
post
Abortion is murder. There is no way around it.
comment in response to
post
It fundamentally does not. You always lose a life with an abortion.
comment in response to
post
You might be what I'm looking for. I'm an abolitionist, I'm looking for a scientific, research backed argument for abortion. I would love to see what data you have.
comment in response to
post
This is false, all of these procedures are allowed under all abortion laws. Stop fear mongering.
comment in response to
post
D&C can be performed in all states to remove the body of a dead baby. There are no total ban states, abortion is legal in all states. Some states only allow abortion for "medically necessary" abortions or before fetal heartbeat.
comment in response to
post
I'm an American simply trying to advocate against abortion. Read her book and find out what Margaret Sanger and planned parenthood are all about. She targeted Black Americans. If she targeted another group, I would have said that. No race baiting here.
comment in response to
post
Children die when abortion is legal
comment in response to
post
Abortion should be considered murder.
comment in response to
post
Okay, but what about when you choose to do something with your body, that kills someone else. Like with murder, or abortion. Should you still have that freedom?
comment in response to
post
...okay did you actually look or are you just stating falsehoods because it's fun
comment in response to
post
You do know that most European countries have more strict abortion laws right?
comment in response to
post
Gotcha, I like them a lot and think they have very good arguments. I struggle however with their root in Christianity. But that's by no means to disparage the work they do. They are my inspiration to do this work
comment in response to
post
I'm not, I don't actually know that that is 😅
comment in response to
post
This is of course a generalization and not fact for every doctor, but if you took a poll of the entirety of the medical establishment and everyone in it that would be willing to bet money that they fall on a pro abortion side.
comment in response to
post
I'm going to be charitable here. Doctors are taught through a particular political lens where if you have any conservative beliefs at all you were usually pushed out of those programs. So when doctors see the fear-mongering around these laws they just believe it instead of actually checking.
comment in response to
post
It's almost like doctors are being willfully ignorant and as a result being medically negligent.
comment in response to
post
They don't have to ask a lawyer they just have to read the law. There are hundreds of other things that doctors need to understand about the law in order to practice, why are doctors suddenly unable to understand the laws in this specific situation of abortion.
comment in response to
post
And I have a question for you. Hypothetically, if this law was perfectly clear about its boundaries on when an abortion can happen. Would you be okay with it then?
comment in response to
post
Here you go, the law is crystal clear. The law writes a blank check to doctors to do whatever is in their reasonable medical judgment. These doctors need to read the law instead of relying on the fear mongering that you and every other pro abortion advocate is pushing.
comment in response to
post
So if you look into this story at all, you will see that under Texas code 170a, there is no provision saying she couldn't get a D&C for an already dead child.. Doctors are allowed to remove a dead baby from the womb in all states that have restricted abortion to medical necessity. Hope this helps.
comment in response to
post
Do you get excited when these stories come out? Do you get excited to stand on the bodies of these women and lie about what happened to them so you can justify the millions of elective abortions where a child is killed for no reason other than they weren't wanted?
comment in response to
post
This one is really simple, she had a miscarriage, baby is dead right. Texas law 170a does not make it illegal to remove a dead baby from a mothers womb. If anyone is held accountable here it should be the doctors that stay willfully ignorant of the laws.
comment in response to
post
You are lying, or misinformed. She died due to sepsis resulting from Strep and a UTI. Her miscarriage happened because of sepsis related stress. Stop standing on the bodies of these women to fear monger about these laws.
comment in response to
post
They are formed developing human beings, The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that life begins at conception. I don't want anyone to die. I am enraged that people kill women and children, but murder is already illegal. Abortion is currently legal in all states.
comment in response to
post
So should we just allow murder because some people still do it?.
Should we try and make murder safe for people who try and commit it because it's dangerous to try and kill somebody?
By your logic we should just have no laws.
comment in response to
post
Because that's already illegal, if you do that to a woman you should be arrested. Abortion is not illegal in the United States, it's special murder rights that women have to kill their unborn children. That's why I advocate for its abolition.
comment in response to
post
This is not a man versus woman issue, this is fundamentally an ethics issue where many women believe that abortion is murder.
comment in response to
post
No I don't have a uterus, but as a former fetus I'm happy I wasn't aborted. I have many people in my life that I care about deeply that would be affected. Some of them agree with me that they don't want to see their fellow human beings killed, and they have uteruses.
comment in response to
post
I think I'm in the perfect spot. There are a ton of people here who disagree with me on this topic. I want to be proven wrong if I'm wrong on this, I just need to see compelling evidence of it. I don't want to be in an echo chamber.
comment in response to
post
I'll take that under consideration 😁
comment in response to
post
Oh shit I forgot to attach the video my bad 😅
comment in response to
post
It looks like her YouTube is more active, I'll look it over. Thank you for the tip 😄
comment in response to
post
It's funny but he lied. Thomas Jefferson serving as secretary of State received a letter asking if they could have cannons on their ships, and he responded in an annoyed way saying yes did you read the second amendment. I'm paraphrasing there but that was the general gist 😆
comment in response to
post
Genuinely thank you for that information, I just followed her.
comment in response to
post
I recommend you get her book "women and the new race" horrific read but informative on what she believed in. I like to use an abolitionist drop card as a bookmark 😁
comment in response to
post
The term reasonable medical judgment is essentially a blank check for doctors to do whatever they need to do in order to save the life of the mother. The only attachment to that is if the baby is still alive they need to try and save the baby.
comment in response to
post
There's the line. This is Texas health code 170A. The doctors need to inform themselves and read the laws.
comment in response to
post
I saw you mention Margaret Sanger earlier. There are articles vilifying her and there were articles calling her an angel. I needed to read her books myself and what I found was egregious.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I don't trust anything someone tells me now a days. I need to read or see things for myself. I trust in science, I believe in America's founding principles of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
comment in response to
post
I mean maybe, people do like their copy pastas here. And I don't know it definitely felt like there was a person behind those words, as missinformed as they were
comment in response to
post
I got blocked lol
comment in response to
post
They already saw that there was no heartbeat, that second check was unnecessary they already knew she was miscarrying. Like I said she died from medical negligence, and the fear-mongering surrounding these laws. If people actually took the time to read 170a and SB 8 they would understand
comment in response to
post
Well then I guess it's fantastic that there's no state in the union that punish a women for having a miscarriage.
comment in response to
post
Source please.
comment in response to
post
Is that what you've read or is that what you've heard. Because I've read the laws and all of them have carve outs for life of the mother and miscarriages.
comment in response to
post
It's okay you can call me a dipshit, I won't report you. And yeah you can be falsely accused of any crime That's why we have a criminal justice system in order to sort that out. As long as the abortion was medically justified they're in the clear.
comment in response to
post
Source
comment in response to
post
Did you know that 96% of 5000 polled biologists agree that life begins at conception. ~85 percent of them were liberal pro choice advocate. A zygote is a human life and a human child