rachymac.bsky.social
Retired teacher. Dem in a purple state. No to the broligarchy! Cat Mom to Princess Madison.
456 posts
4,994 followers
1,798 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I couldn't find a single article about it.
comment in response to
post
I couldn't find ONE article about the MILLIONS of us who protested yesterday. Really? WTH?
comment in response to
post
Have any Republicans ever read the Constitution? Do they have any concept of separation of powers? They SWORE an OATH to it, ffs.
comment in response to
post
Jeffries' words are correct, but his tone sounds like he's discussing a weekend picnic. What would anyone do if a violent mob were breaking the glass and entering their house or place of work?
comment in response to
post
Wow! So it's even worse than being ignorant. He was mocking both of them.
comment in response to
post
Psychopathic.
comment in response to
post
Ummm let's see. What's the difference? Well, one is for all Americans and the other is for Trump only, so......
comment in response to
post
The language is ridiculously mild. This is a clear case of ANTI CONSTITUTIONAL CORRUPTION!
comment in response to
post
The Democratic response to every outrage is..."Just imagine if Obama did this!" But the response SHOULD be the same outrage Republicans would have if a Democrat did it! Scream! Shout! Go on Fox news! We the People are trying, but we need our leaders to try!!
comment in response to
post
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the U S: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." No quid pro quo mentioned!
comment in response to
post
The Constitution does not even mention quid pro quo.
comment in response to
post
It's unconstitutional. Period.
comment in response to
post
EXACTLY!! I'm so sick of the normalization of utter outrage!!
comment in response to
post
They have been planting the word "invasion" in the MAGA mind for years. This is why. But crossing a border to save your family is not a hostile act by a foreign government. And any decent lawyer would be able to make this case.
comment in response to
post
Seriously? Does anyone really wonder why?
comment in response to
post
So wanting to see an ICE facility is worse than killing thousands of people by crashing FOUR planes? What the actual f?
comment in response to
post
He's from a family of refugees. Disgusting.
comment in response to
post
I agree. I have watched journalists speak of the unthinkable in reasonable voices... Even with smiles on their faces, when we should all be SCREAMING in outrage.
comment in response to
post
Masked thugs violently kidnapping people should be an outrage to everyone.
comment in response to
post
It doesn't matter whether anyone "agrees" with the Constitution. We either have a country or we do not
Without the Constitution, we are a lawless anarchy.
comment in response to
post
It's not just the tariffs, it's also the bullying!
comment in response to
post
He's a cheater.
comment in response to
post
So why should we trust it? At all?
comment in response to
post
Without the Constitution, there's no such thing as the rule of law. A President who doesn't know if he is supposed to follow the Constitution doesn't give a crap about law and order.
comment in response to
post
You are a hero!
comment in response to
post
Well, shouldn't he be happy with just a couple of mansions with golf courses?
comment in response to
post
You can't "preserve" the Constitution if you break it. This should be yet another impeachable offense.
comment in response to
post
We will all start shopping at yard sales and goodwill and habitat, etc
comment in response to
post
I watched the stock market respond in real time to his stupid tariff announcements. Do not let him get away with this crap.
comment in response to
post
Given that we watched the stock market react in real time to his stupid tariff pronouncements, this is just more evidence of his colossal mendacity.
comment in response to
post
Here are some more you can add:
Aiding & supporting an enemy (Russia)
Kidnapping of lawful residents
Violation of 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment in El Salvador)
Putting national security in danger by weakening alliances & failing to punish leaks of classified information
comment in response to
post
Congratulations from a resister!!
comment in response to
post
I hope you win. Canada needs a strong advocate who will push back against fascism. The only reason Trump hasn't been threatening you in the past few weeks is so that your opponent can win. Good luck!
comment in response to
post
And practically everything they are doing is anti-constitutional.
comment in response to
post
What exactly does Russia give up?
comment in response to
post
I have one question for her, Trump, and for every single Republican. "WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?"
comment in response to
post
There's a huge difference between deporting someone to their home country and throwing them into a concentration camp/torture gulag.
comment in response to
post
Who could possibly have predicted this?
comment in response to
post
How is it ok to send any human being into a torture camp with no hope of release? And especially without due process? It is most definitely worth fighting for because we're talking about the Constitution, and more than that, decency.
comment in response to
post
Is that real?
comment in response to
post
This government seems not to understand the purpose of due process. They keep alleging that Abrego Garcia is a "terrorist" and wife beater and thus does not deserve due process. But the only people who NEED due process are people accused of crimes!!
comment in response to
post
I'm amazed that anyone thinks it's ok, but I guess that's why we have the Constitutional forbidding of "cruel and unusual punishment.". Because some people love inflicting cruelty on others, and unfortunately, they are in power.
comment in response to
post
Here's what the conversation should be in my opinion. "Is he a person?" "He's a terrorist." "Is he a person?" "He's a gang member." "IS HE A PERSON?"....."yes". "Then he has the RIGHT to due process, according to our Constitution, the one all elected people swore to uphold. PERIOD."
comment in response to
post
Thank you. We must all stand up for the Constitution. Every single member of Congress swore and oath to uphold it. And Due process is specifically deliberated in amendments 5 and 14.
comment in response to
post
Anyone who thinks this is fine is a fascist.
comment in response to
post
What kind of person would send ANY human being into a torture center? 75% have no record of crime at all! It's clear. The people who love this are psychopathic sadists. They're unabashed fascists. And we should call them what they are.