Profile avatar
resistingautocracy.bsky.social
Writer/editor for lab science | Incurable researcher ๐Ÿ’™ | Politics/justice junkie | ๐Ÿฆ‹ | PHL 'burbs #Leguminati | #Angrets | #FreedomFromReligion @Racey.with.a.T๐Ÿงต
1,180 posts 4,630 followers 1,608 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
I hope she flushed it โ€” digitally
comment in response to post
"I sing through my horribly corrected nose, and then they use Auto-Tune to make me sound even more nasal. It's like I can't even carry a tune."
comment in response to post
Go figure, right?
comment in response to post
Willow.
comment in response to post
Slow learner.
comment in response to post
He. Can live in Sarah Palin's house. You know, 'cause it's so close.
comment in response to post
Credibility?? Too late.
comment in response to post
I live Marques!
comment in response to post
๐Ÿคฎ
comment in response to post
Whoa! Love it!
comment in response to post
Yay. Well, at least it'll put us out of our misery before that asteroid.
comment in response to post
Figurehead โ€” er, rather figureBlob. <shudder>
comment in response to post
Happy hump day! ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿฆ‹
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Boost
comment in response to post
Isn't it sufficient simply to repost AG's post? Seems rather inefficient to repeat all the text.
comment in response to post
Sickening, isn't it? I mean, come on, it's only democracy, right?
comment in response to post
Argh, voice transcription error, and no Edit button. *LIKELY
comment in response to post
Lightly too expensive for his DOGE payroll. He prefers visa-ed immigrants, remember?
comment in response to post
Likely so that Trumpeter Swine can privatize the postal system. Coming in 3..., 2..., 1: X.Post
comment in response to post
Easy solution to the block: GET THE HELL OFF X.
comment in response to post
Har. ๐Ÿ‘
comment in response to post
Fuck. ๐Ÿ˜ž
comment in response to post
Executive orders are, many times, wishful thinking.
comment in response to post
Get 'em!
comment in response to post
Boost
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Did someone say follow-back party? ๐ŸŒ€๐Ÿ’ง๐Ÿพ
comment in response to post
"The blackout drunk defense".
comment in response to post
Sand is good, too.
comment in response to post
Surround show names in double quotes, not single. Single quotes are British English style, not American English.
comment in response to post
They say the third time's the charm! ๐Ÿฆ‹
comment in response to post
How BLUE is this CREW? ๐Ÿ’™
comment in response to post
Feels like that kind of day, yeah. ๐Ÿ’ฅ
comment in response to post
I would love to join your next group! ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™
comment in response to post
Woo hoo!
comment in response to post
Please don't let this end with "grab 'em by the pussy".
comment in response to post
Congratulations!
comment in response to post
It's amazing isn't it? Scathing. Blistering.
comment in response to post
Flagrant, fatal arrogance.
comment in response to post
Haha, we used the same wording.
comment in response to post
Wow!!
comment in response to post
These last lines are scathingly, blisteringly brilliant.
comment in response to post
Thanks for the Camus quote. Stealing!
comment in response to post
I remember that word from several months back...in the before times.
comment in response to post
The CDC is on Substack.
comment in response to post
Wait 'til that blows up in their faces. Pun intended.