reverse-norms.bsky.social
Real person, but won't be making posts. Volunteer mod for a labeler.
40 posts
2 followers
0 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
testing again
comment in response to
post
testing...
comment in response to
post
test filter
comment in response to
post
testing...
comment in response to
post
aimod report response: We don't handle AI-text accounts, only AI-image. The user you are reporting hasn't posted AI images here on BSKY. Until they do, we have nothing to take action on!
Thank you for trying to help and I hope you will continue to report AI images/video!
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Tweaking the settings for the AI filters is not the same as "making" your own. You can see the AI generated mess all over the clothing especially.
This is not a "smoothing" filter, it's a generative AI filter.
Also the PFP on your (RiotGrlErin) account is not labeled AI, not sure why you said that.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Some people do have styles that are similar to what people commonly prompt from AI. That's just the unfortunate reality. So you need more than just HIVE and a vibe to be publicly slandering someone, otherwise we'll eat eachother alive.
comment in response to
post
You're being way too aggressive based on only one data-point & a vibe.
The art itself is clearly not generated. So then the claim becomes, are they tracing over AI output, which is harder to prove.
At most you should just be kindly asking if they could do a timelapse to help people know it's not.
comment in response to
post
I get that sucks, but it's kinda where we're at in the world now with how smart grifters have become and how varied in opinion some talented artists are on using AI in their workflow and not being willing to disclose it.
If we want people to trust our work as authentic, we often have to do more now.
comment in response to
post
calling out an artist as using AI just cuz it has an AI vibe & detectors trigger on some.
But I'd def recommend artists like this who seems to be creating in a common AI-like style to record one time-lapse from start-to-finish showing they can produce this type of work from scratch, not as trace.->
comment in response to
post
HIVE can often detect trace-overs of AI because of how much each genAI converges to some very specific poses, perspectives, proportions, lighting and framing.
But again it's obviously not 100%, since genAI are trained on works that are similar to that.
So yes, nobody should just be publicly ->
comment in response to
post
The issue lately becomes people who absolutely are talented artists, still using genAI to pump out work faster. Kim Tae of ShiftUP (Nikke, Stellar Blade) games is amazing, but now heavily uses AI to generate works... So just because someone is clearly skilled doesn't mean they aren't using AI.->
comment in response to
post
very training these genAI use against them by training against their outputs. We cannot do data analysis/comparison on the scale ML tools can, we can't spot patterns on the same precision/scale.
There's a reason HIVE is able to list what AI an image likely used while no human really can generally.->
comment in response to
post
HIVE is actually one of the most reliable ones. But I agree that it isn't going to be 100% accurate.
It should only be used to help confidence on top of other evidence you have found.
But it's not "taking the thinking away" to use them, because it does something we as humans can't, it can use the ->
comment in response to
post
False analogy.
People volunteer for this. 99.9% of the art used in the current AI datasets have not been consented to or volunteered to be used for that purpose.
comment in response to
post
So if you do care about humans and a kind society where we care about eachother, then not supporting AI imagery should be an important cause to you as well.
Removing previously reported images and no longer sharing it will get the label removed.
This post above is AI.
comment in response to
post
that only is able to function by taking, without consent, from artists and people around the world and giving nothing back to them, so people can personally gain off their backs, harming them in the process.
And nevermind the environmental issues and supporting people like Sam Altman.
comment in response to
post
Your DMs aren't open to request from non-friends, so asking for communication from the AI labeler is impossible.
To answer your question, yes AI isn't allowed, that should be obvious. You seem to care about many social issues, yet you are willing to participate in supporting the use of software ->
comment in response to
post
Everyone makes mistakes or has misunderstandings.
comment in response to
post
Also just to be clear, the label is removed if the avatar is replaced with one that isn't AI. It's not a scarlet letter.
It only stays for as long as the image does.
Drawings that are ran through AI to "assist/add detail", still count, as they are still benefiting the same unethical datasets.
comment in response to
post
Damn, look at you assuming to know if I'm disabled. Damn, look at you acting like you get to speak for all disabled.👏
There's disabled folk who don't even have arms to draw with who still work at learning to make art, there's no excuse.
Disability isn't an excuse to throw away moral consciousness.
comment in response to
post
If you just directly trace the line yes, and is how a certain recent someone's "sketch layer" looks like, if we're thinking of the same person.
But it can definitely be done in a way that will make it look more natural.
comment in response to
post
Yes, this is the only real way to do it now unfortunately. Even a ClipStudio timelapse doesn't entirely suffice, because there is a trick to hiding a layer that you're painting over in the timelapse output.
comment in response to
post
AI Image. It's definitely a hard one to tell.
www.reddit.com/r/pics/comme...
comment in response to
post
AI generated. You likely don't want this on your profile.
comment in response to
post
This is a very AI generated image, unfortunately.
comment in response to
post
This is AI unfortunately. Try to find original sources to nature photography before posting, otherwise it's very likely AI now.
A few other posts you've made are AI as well. I'll leave a comment on them for you.
Please change your profile pic to a non-AI as well if you want your AI labels removed.
comment in response to
post
In case anyone worries this one is AI because of how it looks, it's not.
comment in response to
post
Disabled, neurodivergent, digital-only, they're all artists who still work to develop their art that's unique to them. Grouping them with you is disgusting.
AI "artists" they just ask for things & expect praise.
Why would anyone value something they can also do in seconds?
Process is what's admired.
comment in response to
post
Nobody is gatekeeping art. The flaw in your logic is thinking "you" are making art this way. No, you're asking something else to make the art for you, and that thing only does it by directly taking from the labor of actual artists.
Everyone can learn arts. Disabled artists don't like AI either.
comment in response to
post
I'll even gift you the money for a year of ClipStudio as compensation if proven wrong.
I'd love to be wrong, there's no joy in this kind of situation.
comment in response to
post
link your VOD from October, we'll gladly look at it. My DMs are also open if you want to send the PSD.
It's going to require extraordinary evidence to combat the signs in this image. You would be the first person in the world to have shown they naturally draw the issues we look for into their art.
comment in response to
post
There are major signs all over your image and analysis tools also corroborate that with a 100% rating.
Multiple very experienced people have analyzed it, and we only label when there is certainty.
I avoid explaining in detail as to not help people hide their usage easier later.
If you want to ->🧵
comment in response to
post
That doesn't show anything that would prove otherwise. And again, the AI artifacts are more than clear enough in the image, so it's disappointing you're putting in more effort to claim its your work instead of being honest and moving forward with honest work.
comment in response to
post
publicly be against genAI and supportive of creators. So it's extra weird to see you make this claim and even sign it and put that anti-AI label on it.
Did you draw a sketch and then run it through AI to "finalize" it? Because that still makes it count as an AI image, it's not just prompted stuff.
comment in response to
post
DMs closed, so responding to your label appeal here claiming you drew it.
Profile picture is 100% AI, likely Dall-E.
It's very clear with various features melting into others & the AI-specific artifacts.
The work you've shown on streams I could find is nothing like this either.
You seem to.. ->🧵