Profile avatar
revistaminervauniv.bsky.social
Publicação online com ensaios, críticas e crónicas. Uma ponte entre o mundo académico e a sociedade civil. www.revistaminerva.pt
160 posts 523 followers 4,230 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to post
Informação totalmente falsa. A título individual não recebeu coisa nenhuma. SpaceX tem contratos com o estado (não são “subsídios”) e Tesla aproveita os benefícios estatais dados à mobilidade eléctrica, como outras companhias. Bárbara Reis fala do que não entende (não é a primeira nem última vez).
comment in response to post
“In Caraballo’s case, posting “DOGE emails” likely exposed such private elements, leading to permanent suspension on March 8, 2025. The line depends on whether the emails were already public, properly redacted, or consented to—X’s judgment seems to have favored privacy over transparency.” By grok.
comment in response to post
“(…) In conclusion, government emails aren’t inherently private—they’re often public records subject to disclosure under U.S. law. However, they can contain private information (e.g., personal data or internal deliberations) that X’s doxxing policy protects.
comment in response to post
“(…) If these emails contain non-public personal details (e.g., unredacted names, addresses, or internal deliberations), they could be considered private under X’s doxxing policy, even if they’re government-related. (…)”
comment in response to post
“The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), proposed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, isn’t a formal government agency but an advisory group. Emails tied to DOGE could include government correspondence if involving federal employees or contractors. (…)