Profile avatar
rgblights.bsky.social
Cyber guy. Former NSA cybersecurity director and chief of TAO. Lover of memes. Warning - occasional outrageous Christmas light content.
159 posts 10,015 followers 571 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Groanโ€ฆ.
comment in response to post
Sorry. Correct link drive.google.com/file/d/1fwlE...
comment in response to post
lol. I did need Ai to speak your language.
comment in response to post
๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฆ๐‘• ๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ช๐‘‘ ๐‘‘๐‘ท ๐‘ค๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ๐‘ง๐‘Ÿ, ๐‘š๐‘ณ๐‘‘ ๐‘ฆ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘Ÿ ๐‘‘๐‘ฐ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฉ๐‘’๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ๐‘‘ ๐‘‘๐‘ง ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘จ๐‘›๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘›๐‘ง๐‘™ ๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฆ๐‘› ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฆ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘›๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘ฆ๐‘‘ ๐‘’๐‘ต๐‘’ ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘š ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘–๐‘‘ ๐‘›๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฆ๐‘‘ ๐‘‘๐‘ฐ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘’๐‘ณ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ค๐‘ฆ๐‘› ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘•.
comment in response to post
โ€ชAnd info on the protocol courtesy of @psifertex.bsky.social โ€ช github.com/psifertex/gf...
comment in response to post
I didn't know I needed a DMX to RF transmitter until now.
comment in response to post
@subtee.bsky.social Thanks! More details in the talk slides here: drive.google.com/file/d/1OKYO...
comment in response to post
๐Ÿคท๐Ÿป
comment in response to post
Lol
comment in response to post
By Kiwiโ€ฆ
comment in response to post
Someone told me about them after my talk today. First heard for me but sounds cool.
comment in response to post
Also (20 +25)(20 +25) =2025
comment in response to post
4. 2025 is the only square year our generation will see. The next square year is 2116 A.D. (92 years away) 5. 2025 is also the product of two squares (9ยฒ ร— 5ยฒ) = 2025 6. 2025 is the sum of three squares (40ยฒ + 20ยฒ + 5ยฒ) = 2025 What else?
comment in response to post
Looking good again Paul!
comment in response to post
I was the loudest voice in govt on Supermicro bunk: appleinsider.com/articles/18/... With volt typhoon we are in a different era where PRC is actively prepping to take out infrastructure. The community canโ€™t be naive and complacent. Casting this as economics is incorrect and we will just disagree.
comment in response to post
Dan-you are wildly incorrect on your assumption. This is not an economic motivation, but a supply chain security decision. Marcus-I do think there is substance here. We see them as a consistent component of PRC bot-net infrastructure & the reluctance to join efforts to address security sealed it.