rickredmond1.bsky.social
11 posts
12 followers
44 following
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I think there’s confusion because “restaurant” is a broad term (look at any dictionary definition) that includes multiple narrower categories (bars, cafes) including “restaurant.” But if your local gov passed an ordinance governing food safety at restaurants, it would 100% apply to Chuck E Cheese.
comment in response to
post
Re: Chuck E. Cheese, it obviously is a restaurant. It may also be something else, but just like the ball pit doesn’t turn McDonalds into a not restaurant, having games and such doesn’t mean it’s not an establishment that serves food prepared on site and for immediate on site consumption.
comment in response to
post
Give the man what he wants and send him to Mars.
comment in response to
post
Not clear that congressional dems have standing here (there remedy would be impeachment but of course that’s a dead letter without majorities) but the states obviously do…
comment in response to
post
It’s a very fun game.
comment in response to
post
This is actually a good answer, though still a little weird nobody at SD/Bytedance/etc saw that coming.
comment in response to
post
Nobody at the us government took any action last night. Somebody decided the law applied to Second Dinner and then took the game down based on that analysis. I’m asking who that person was, because I don’t believe they just figured it out last night.
comment in response to
post
Who made the call to take the game down then?
comment in response to
post
As written, the rule singles out Israel without distinguishing between mandatory and voluntary service. I’d find a law that said dual citizens of recognized countries get equivalent credit for mandatory service in the other country.
comment in response to
post
Is this even a blowout?
comment in response to
post
No, because the controlling opinion doesn’t rely on the AI-the AI concurrence (and another more normal concurrence) is actually saying that the definition they’re using is wrong and too punitive, and that the full circuit should consider the case so they can overturn it.