sadieq.bsky.social
Chicken Duck Woman Thing
45 posts
203 followers
213 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Lol you're only admitting that that's what you'd be doing in there, bud.
I don't. I'm going to take the brave stance of admitting I don't, in fact, rape people.
comment in response to
post
Joke's on you. I've been doing it without issue for a decade.
Turns out in the real world, it's not actually genitals or chromosomes that matter to people.
It's just appearance. Just bigotry.
comment in response to
post
Furthermore, there's no reason related to biological sexual reproduction to segregate them. There are only traditional social roles and mores that are being relied on to argue for their continued separation.
Also gender.
comment in response to
post
They are gender separated.
Social spaces do not have biological features, and therefore cannot be sexed. We create social categories that are indirectly related to sexual characteristics to segregate them.
That's gender.
comment in response to
post
I don't feel excluded I'm quite secure in my political positions in spite of your hackneyed criticism.
comment in response to
post
I work for a living where I can. I don't own the places. I like how it's now lefty purity testing, though. Red herrings abound.
comment in response to
post
The solution actually is better community, but because our "community" allows these grifters to propagate and focuses hard on cishet nuclear family dynamics, it'll have to do. You'll have to do it yourself. Like I did.
comment in response to
post
Then you'll have to actually fight the grift, bud, rather than elevating it as an attractive alternative to angry feminists.
comment in response to
post
She's right. My entire point is that *we* should be teaching boys and men that their support of a point of view shouldn't be based on theur insecurities, but on the actual merit of that perspective.
If you're alienated by merely being distrusted, you've been woefully unprepared for this world.
comment in response to
post
We do. It's just not as easily packaged as "you're such a good deserving boy." 🤷♀️
comment in response to
post
Possibly. Alternatively I've raised three boys, none of which have fallen for that cheap instant gratification masculinity grift those hucksters are selling.
If you *actually* want to raise boys, raise them. Stop depending on women and podcasters to do it.
comment in response to
post
What's interesting to me about this conversation is the tacit admission that men and boys can't handle honesty and would rather be manipulated by grifters and liars who'll tell them what they want to hear. Ego-stroking might have "allure," but maybe teach that boy the difference.
comment in response to
post
Men aren't and haven't been allowed to play in women's sports or use "private" single-sex spaces.
Public changing rooms and bathrooms aren't "private" anyway. They're public. It's right there in the name.
comment in response to
post
Liberals arbitrarily means testing online criticism is so on brand I'm surprised it hasn't been sold to Raytheon.
comment in response to
post
Jist in case anyone's seeing this shit since he blocked me... here's the inconvenient truth.
comment in response to
post
The biology talk you were engaging in was a red herring, and you know it. You get to float unworkable solutions to that made-up problem because it's all speculative to you.
All theory. The actual problem is you and your little savior ego, not us and our desire to participate.
comment in response to
post
Oh you were wasting your breath from the very beginning. You aren't doing us a favor by segregating us into a tranny league, further there's no reason to do it other than reactionary propaganda you've apparently fallen for.
You're not a good person, liberal. You're just another bigot.
Goodnight!
comment in response to
post
Why? I'm having fun. Are you not having fun?
comment in response to
post
And yet this is comment what... 30? In this derailed thread?
Maybe if you're gonna talk seriously about trans rights, you should reign in those insecurities.
That way maybe you don't trap yourself into concern trolling about our own leagues. 🤷♀️
comment in response to
post
Wait you've been serious all this time?
God I wouldn't be admitting that.
comment in response to
post
What does that even mean? I am serving fish over here ngl. You gotta learn more about the queers before you level insults, princess.
comment in response to
post
Oh no what happens when I irritate you? You jerk off harder?
comment in response to
post
Surest sign I know I'm not paying rent up there is being called a tryhard on the internet by a guy who looks like a thumb.
comment in response to
post
Lolol you insulted me first, babe. A little trash talk is what it's about anyway haven't you ever actually watched a WNBA game?
Oh right none of you fuckers give the first shit about women's sports. Just the "trans problem."
comment in response to
post
Lmaooooo
What a fuckin' loser take. Girl I'm just not as terminally online as you apoear to be.
comment in response to
post
The solution is LETTING US PLAY WITH OUR GENDER IDENTITY.
You're solving a problem YOU'RE CREATING. With bullsgit half measures that aren't workable and allow us no dignity or respect.
The fact that you don't think "possible solution" is "theorizing" is insanely stupid. Sophistry on wheels lol.
comment in response to
post
Oh so you think "if you build it they will come?"
We've been able to play all along, jackass. Until very recently. Why would any of us be more enticed by a fuckin' tranny league than playing with our actual friends?
It's THEORIZING to you. It's LIFE for us. Sit the fuck down.
comment in response to
post
Lol not allowing us to compete on the gendered categories that match our identity IS across the board exclusion you simple piece of shit. You want to create a sports league for the TWELVE trans athletes? You think that's workable?
You fuckers live in fantasyland.
comment in response to
post
Your very first comment was advocating for across the board exclusion. No competing with our own gender.
comment in response to
post
Say what you mean then. What *exact* point are you making.
Be clear or go fuck yourself.
comment in response to
post
Why make the argument that we aren't undergoing physiological repression of male traits if you aren't leading toward a meaningful conclusion? Thought experiment?
Must be nice. I'll be over here actually ovcupying and experiencing this body you're theorizing about.
comment in response to
post
Also there are a great many more karyotypes than XX and XY and cells that don't even have nucleotides (like red blood cells) so rather than generalizing about a biology you don't understand, perhaps you should engage with a taxonomy you also don't understand.
comment in response to
post
I no longer produce gametes, so you could reasonably assume I've reduced their size to zero... if you insist on being pedantic rather than examining that your argument is entirely semantic (definition of sex) rather than biological.
comment in response to
post
If it varies by person, why are you advocating for across the board exclusion rather than case-by-case examination? You're the ones generalizing, not us.
comment in response to
post
How is this an argumenf against the fact that we can?
comment in response to
post
Bro nobody was expecting you to do shit anyway. We don't need you or your self-important savior bullshit ass ego. If you see one of us getting beat, go ahead and use your phone to do what all narcissists do and shove it right up your self-important ass. You have my full permission.
comment in response to
post
Think of it like this:
Republicans are grabbing the hands of the marginalized and smacking us with them while giggling "Why are you hitting yourself why are you hitting youself?!"
And the Democrats are like "Why ARE they hitting themselves? Today on Morning Joe!"
comment in response to
post
I think pretending this is some game of political 4D chess when it's actually bullies just bullying people is losing before you start.
I also think the fact that y'all will performatively gesture at strategic thinking while framing things exclusively in binary "defy or accept" terms is very naive.
comment in response to
post
And they get away with it with impunity because they know you'll follow rules they don't intend to.
And you'd think after 50 years of this, liberals would expect it.
But the real truth is they actually don't give a shit. It really is a right wing lie that they do.
comment in response to
post
The problem is this third-way posturing actually doesn't convince voters. We just had an entire election about it.
It's not lose-lose. It's SET-UP. The right telegraphs its punches by attacking these groups and then tells you that defending them is "only caring about that."
And you fall for it.
comment in response to
post
"The Democrats shouldn't conform to the right wing notion that they actually give a shit." is...
Well it's a take.
comment in response to
post
No.
This is what she did: She saw the writing on the wall that this fight would make her a pariah in her own party, so she gave it up because alienating donors and constituents would have been poison to her career.
That's all it is. There is no revolution from within the system.
comment in response to
post
This is total nonsense. Nothing in the history of anything has ever been gained with submission, even when it leans into a stereotype.
Misogyny is why that stereotype exists in the first place. You can't "disarm" someone by laying down arms.