samlibby.bsky.social
Bad at bios, good at takes. Lawyer, @utexaslaw.bsky.socialš¤ @Dartmouth. Opinions my own. He/him. RTs = endorsements except when they donāt.
30 posts
55 followers
75 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
NYC is so great for tourists that weāre going to criminalize Citi bikers who blow through a stop sign / red light
comment in response to
post
What even is a writ of mandamus anyway? Asking forā¦the DOJ
comment in response to
post
If thereās one thing that courts love, itās duplicative litigation
comment in response to
post
LOTS of Big Law firms names conspicuously absent from this list, howeverā¦..
comment in response to
post
Can Andy Oldham really be on SCOTUS watch when heās like 5ā6ā?
comment in response to
post
writing as a mid level associate at a biglaw firm that has not yet been targeted by Trump, if that should happen and my firm surrendered like this I would be gone within the week. This is an absolute red line for me.
comment in response to
post
They were told by HR from that district not to respond
comment in response to
post
(Per screenshot from a friend)
comment in response to
post
Iām not sureānot that lucky yet!
comment in response to
post
Federal law clerks have received the email
comment in response to
post
Swing and a miss on this joke I guess
comment in response to
post
But would this have happened if the game didnāt suck this bad?
comment in response to
post
Do you know why itās unsigned?
comment in response to
post
Isnāt standing their ābestā argument under existing precedent? Ignoring, of course, the broader theories of statesā standing that emerged during the Biden years
comment in response to
post
But even so, no private plaintiffs would have standing or a cause of action if Iām reading the statute correctly? So itās sort of a moot point if AG Bondi doesnāt want to enforce the law
comment in response to
post
Not necessarily. Itās common for plaintiffs to forum shop and try to find the best court for their claims regardless of what the standard is. I think itās fair to judge them for that decision, but I wouldnāt say itās out of the ordinary
comment in response to
post
Fair question! Iād defer to any Iowa practitioner on that. Possible there might be procedural advantages (I.e., a lower pleading standard)