Profile avatar
scottwilliams9.bsky.social
24 posts 29 followers 47 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter

Much research in human disease requires defining context - and this is very much a judgement call. Whose judgment is best becomes key question - do we want expert knowledge or LLM compilations or both? No easy and clear answers and if case by case will AI do well or just extend current ignorance?

There is waste at NIH and on NIH grants but much of the really wasteful money is spent on developing systems mandated by Congress to be more "accountable" with taxpayer $$. If we spent more on science and less on bureaucracy we would be far ahead.

You can collect the right data and do your analyses correctly but if you make wrong assumptions get a very incorrect answer.

DOGE: If this is AI in action I can't wait to see Musk's self-driving cars on the road en masse!

There is overabundance of business thinking in all realms now. This is one approach, not the only one. It doesn't work very well for most non-profit enterprises. The business mindset uses a unitary metric for success. Need to include more diverse, long-term ways of measuring success

Why do people who stand to gain billions but have conflict move forward while I need to fill out multiple forms for the privilege (pain) of reviewing NIH grants? We are in a truly double speak universe now. Cognitive dissonance rules

Are there simply too many papers and journals to able to keep up? Hence we just give up

There is a relationship between how much you read and your ability to write. PhD students who don't read the literature are more likely to not only cite inadequately but they are more likely to produce mediocre papers that have limited utility

Everyone needs to look at the list of changes. Everyone is troubling aline, but together

There are compelling scientific reasons for studying diverse populations in biomedical research. It can improve knowledge of disease processes for everyone! www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...

Really? They couldn't take that position *before* the election? When he promised to do it? Over and over again?

I try to avoid politics in my science comments but this is impossible to ignore. What is the point? Intimidation? Or drive scientists out of US? Trump hits NIH with ‘devastating’ freezes on meetings, travel, communications, and hiring | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...

Can an analogy be drawn between reductionist science and transactional behavior in politics? Keep the perspective narrow?

A paper of ours from about a year ago that addresses question - what it means for a genetic variant to be pathogenic. There is no easy answer. And the answer can change for the same variant www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Complexity is not a synonym for multiple simple and additive phenomena. Why do we so often model it that way?