securescientist.eu
Dad, husband, cybercrime prof with a kink for attacker economics. Head of the Threat Analysis group @tue.nl. š³š± by profession, š®š¹ by nature, šŖšŗ by conviction. Optimistic cynicism is my thing. Love most. ššsecurescientist.eu
1,213 posts
2,950 followers
852 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
A me i campi vuoti nei dataset fan venire lāansia.
comment in response to
post
Shouldnāt we just settle for an half an hour offset between DST and solar all year round and never think of this again. Srsly though.
comment in response to
post
A cosa ti riferisci? Non vivo in Italia da parecchio, ma di Udine non me preoccupavo certo.
comment in response to
post
JD does say a lot of words when he speaks. Iāll leave it at that.
comment in response to
post
Buying the dip, or was it all just chaos and not a fundamental concern of the market?
comment in response to
post
Android being famously used on devices made on us-only fully integrated supply chains and manufacturing.
comment in response to
post
š¤£
comment in response to
post
Didnāt know you work on trade tariffs and their global effects! Exciting times. š
comment in response to
post
Must be the monthly testing at noon?
comment in response to
post
Well.. how?
comment in response to
post
Well why in pounds. The UK could in principle still buy the Japanese ones at the usual price.
comment in response to
post
TBH I also forgot dazi was a word. Tariffe is a thing but aināt a dazio.
comment in response to
post
At least he made a prediction of kinds. Something he can be called up on. So far afaik there were zero KPIs to evaluate the outcome of the decision.
comment in response to
post
If she goes to jail remains to be seen, but surely wonāt run for office in the coming round. How this leaves the French political scenario I am not sure, her second is very young and Macron cannot run again.
comment in response to
post
Underrated post.
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/secu...
comment in response to
post
They even labeled the x axis wrong.
comment in response to
post
That said ofc nobody wins in a nuclear escalation but still 2000 vs 500 I think is misleading. Itād be more like 200 vs 10x25 plus remainder in UK and FR.
comment in response to
post
UK and Franceās deterrence is limited without US cover because credibly they wouldnāt nuke Moscow if Moscow nukes, say, Warsaw. Spreading the warheads across Europe reduces capabilities significantly, and 500 warheads arenāt that many once you distribute those over 20 different countries.
comment in response to
post
The first one says troublemaker. The second says asshole.
comment in response to
post
Weāre living through a fundamental shift in how discourse is created. Institutions once shaped a shared reality through discourse - imperfectly, but with structure. Now, that reality has splintered. In its place, engagement-driven ecosystems amplify whatever resonates, truth optional.