settledlaw.bsky.social
đź’™ Do not go gentle into that good night đź’™
239 posts
488 followers
657 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
You'd think Chuck would have better spelling since he was around for the creation of the alphabet.
comment in response to
post
I’ve heard people saying that she’s a consultant and might have a security clearance. If that turns out to be true, remember that simply having top secret clearance does NOT mean she had a right to know the info that was shared.
comment in response to
post
The guy who shared classified info with one group using a private and unsecured communications platform and got caught, also shared with OTHER groups using the same private communications platform.
comment in response to
post
I think the framing is perfect. Because the issue really isn’t whether this man, personally, deserves due process. It’s that EVERYONE is entitled to due process.
comment in response to
post
This is so gross and embarrassing for our country.
comment in response to
post
It was all right there for everyone to see, before the election. And yet no one believed it could really happen. Even one of my reasonably minded blue-voting friends thought project 2025 was just propaganda, until I told her to look at it for herself.
comment in response to
post
Since El Salvador’s president is flying here anyway, he can just bring Kilmar back to the US on the same flight…right? Because bringing that man back should be Trump’s ONLY priority right now. Not policy discussions.
comment in response to
post
Does she have any control over what he happens to be doing during a meeting he scheduled?
comment in response to
post
FFS. Trump is intentionally trying to convince the public she’s on his side, why are you repeating his bullshit?
comment in response to
post
Why are you playing right into Trump’s hands by portraying her meeting as a capitulation? FFS.
comment in response to
post
Based on what? FFS, everyone is playing right into Trump’s hands with these assumptions.
comment in response to
post
Not sure why people are assuming she’s working with him on anything? He called her to a meeting. He’s the president so she joined the meeting.
comment in response to
post
Legal immigrants are being deported without due process. Is that nothing?
comment in response to
post
Take it up with Trump. He’s the president you wanted, apparently.
comment in response to
post
And you keep justifying the federal government’s erasure of trans people. If Gaza was equally doomed either way, I guess protecting trans people wasn’t important enough to voters?
comment in response to
post
If Gaza was a dealbreaker for her, why wasn’t it one for trump?
comment in response to
post
They get no excuses from me. I don’t need a party to cater to me, specifically, to know that racism and sexism are bad and to vote accordingly.
comment in response to
post
I didn’t forget. And I’m never going to forget the many, many people who helped (through action or inaction) let that menace back into office.
comment in response to
post
So nothing is better for Gaza and yet many things are substantially worse for most Americans. Just like we warned people - over and over again - before the election. Before I mute you, just know that I sincerely hope next time you make better choices.
comment in response to
post
So supporting genocide was the black woman candidate’s fatal error, but it somehow wasn’t a barrier for Trump, a white man. Huh…I wonder why that was? Oh well, good luck advocating for Gaza with your new president.
comment in response to
post
You clearly didn’t listen to the speech, because that’s not what she said.
comment in response to
post
Every single GOP lawmaker. They’re the ones with the real power to rein in their own party.
comment in response to
post