sheskis.bsky.social
22 posts
125 followers
174 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Yeah, can't wait for that 6'2" 139 lbs, like we can't all see he's a fat toad.
comment in response to
post
Jesus, they're apparently sleeping in the offices they're ransacking, what costs 7 million in a week?
comment in response to
post
Doesn't it seem that the scions of obscenely wealthy people, with whatever superior college they supposedly attend, get exponentially stupider with each generation? Because they don't have to work, don't have to try, they barely have to get out of be, are guaranteed wealth and are truly ignorant.
comment in response to
post
God Schumer how fucking tone-deaf. Wait til trump tariffs raise ALL prices, not only are eggs expensive, you won't find them. Dairy Lumber Energy Seafood - Canada. Produce - Mexico. Trump dumps water stored for famers in San Joaquin valley out when it's need in summer. Kiss your avocados goodbye.
comment in response to
post
The press sec sent out a tweet saying it was NOT a rescission of the funding freeze; "it was simply a rescission of the OMB memo" to circumvent the court order, but that the funding freeze remains in effect and "will be vigorously implemented. Playing dirty little games to the end.
comment in response to
post
We love to travel, but it's so fucking embarrassing to go anywhere anymore; we tell people we're from Canada.
comment in response to
post
I would quit before I sent a piece of shit like that out.
comment in response to
post
John Fetterman doing thumbs-up photo ops with Adam Christian Johnson, who was pictured during the riot walking through the Capitol with then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's lectern and convicted, isn't a great look.
comment in response to
post
Do we purchase so much from Denmark that tariffs would actually matter?
comment in response to
post
Sure it is, they fabricated an unenforceable code of ethics that didn't really cover any violations they might commit.
comment in response to
post
John Roberts no longer has to wonder why nobody respects the supreme court.
comment in response to
post
It's Faux, just fearmongering for a reason to attack Panama. Importantly, Panama has no military. The US military is to defend them if attacked. So, would we be the attacker or the defender?
comment in response to
post
Trump never cared about them; they got him elected, he doesn't need them anymore. He isn't going to protect them.
comment in response to
post
Panama has no military; the US is responsible for defense if the canal is attacked. Is it a stretch to imagine trump might send in the military to "protect" them?
comment in response to
post
The "United States of America" does not feel this.
comment in response to
post
“Could benefit friends and punish rivals”. You don’t need to read an article to know this.
comment in response to
post
How moronic; really?
comment in response to
post
How DARE she be happy; she lost and should be weeping and tearing her hair out.
comment in response to
post
They won, but they thrive on outrage, so everything we do is going to piss them off. Especially if we appear happy in spite of the devastating loss. And I think they really hate that, despite winning, we all still think they're bigoted, racist, misogynist losers.
comment in response to
post
Lake is emailing people asking for money to fund a recount. Do you suppose she'll ever concede?