shmambytandenbaum.bsky.social
55 posts
52 followers
421 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Dare I say, I think Stancil is just talking about charisma
comment in response to
post
I'm also not sure it is fair to say he is "constantly insisting" that people pay for a subscription.
comment in response to
post
how do you take the fact that Alito did not sign off his dissent with either "I dissent" or "I respectfully dissent"?
comment in response to
post
Mb...Does seem good to make the 5th circ a less attractive place for buckwild partisan arguments, though. Currently there's a pipeline from Amarillo to SCOTUS, and SCOTUS is only marginally reigning these decisions in.
comment in response to
post
Watermelon is a delicious fruit but has Plausible Deniability attached to it.
I want evidence
comment in response to
post
I still remember the objections to his nomination that he lacks the judicial temperament. Ah well.
comment in response to
post
The fight has always been about the boundaries of acceptable speech. This is merely the latest, and admittedly most concerning, instance in a long-running trend.
comment in response to
post
Republicans don’t like cancel culture because the targeted speech there overwhelmingly came from older, white, and male speakers. But for years now, that same party has targeted speech by banning books, passing ridiculous content moderation laws, and pushing for NYT v. Sullivan to be overturned.
comment in response to
post
Hold firm, Senator!
comment in response to
post
Window 10 to Linux. You’ve already switched from 10 to 11, so the og post is not a comment on your circumstances. And yet, you commented.
comment in response to
post
Wow so it sounds like this doesn’t really apply to you but you complained anyway
comment in response to
post
Excited to read it
comment in response to
post
Way to go, Chris. We need more of this.
comment in response to
post
Cool thank you both for giving up so quickly
comment in response to
post
Elon has never hit a performance target on time anyway
comment in response to
post
And what is “false arrogance” makes it sound like someone is pretending to be arrogant
comment in response to
post
You’re of course referring to Star Wars Episode III
comment in response to
post
At some point you’re going to realize that a prescriptive binary like this is impossible to apply to something subjective like humor.
“I follow all the rules, so I’m funny.”
comment in response to
post
Not according to you: If people are being harmed, it's bullying, not humor.
comment in response to
post
I don’t think even you believe that if *anyone* *anywhere* has their feelings hurt it automatically transforms a joke into bullying.
comment in response to
post
You sure about that?
comment in response to
post
For purposes of 1A analysis it sure does
comment in response to
post
Lazyeye says “target,” you say “affect.” But those are different standards
comment in response to
post
Yes that’s the point I’m making.
comment in response to
post
How hard is it to learn to read cursive though? Doesn’t have to be rare if you’re teaching how.