skepticlbelievr.bsky.social
376 posts
127 followers
43 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I think you're skipping a step there...
MY takeaway, is we still need to do step one.
comment in response to
post
Like... Completely unsolicited? 😶
comment in response to
post
What the actual fuck....
comment in response to
post
Was it a specific episode, and if so, you have a link?
comment in response to
post
THEY described what they're doing as "a revolution". Not sure how much of an effect simply saying "no" will have... Especially because of BS like this. We are *barreling* towards that shit.
truthout.org/articles/tru...
comment in response to
post
They've already announced they're fully prepared to put down the opposition with prejudice. While I appreciate the sentiment for non-violence, I'm not sure you're fully grasping the situation. This isn't like simply disagreeing on how much to spend on a certain program...
comment in response to
post
Is that a real picture? 🤔
comment in response to
post
Even if it never went full Skynet, the possibility of HIS systems gaining that kind of control over our nuclear weapons systems should fucking terrify you.
comment in response to
post
And I WOULDN'T assume this is completely unrelated... He really does seem like the kind of douchebag that would take the "Don't give AI control over nukes" message from the Terminator series as a personal challenge. 🙄
www.cbsnews.com/news/doge-fi...
comment in response to
post
What I'm starting to think, is they're ALREADY working towards this. Rewriting code so the systems will work with his AI...
www.cio.com/article/3828...
comment in response to
post
Honestly, go big or go home. A dealership won't really hurt his bottom line, or send that big of a message to him. Tesla HQ would.
comment in response to
post
"Republicans are starting to get torn apart by their own constituents."
Let's be real... Their constituents could "tear them apart" for the next 2 years. They'll still put them back in office when the time comes.
comment in response to
post
Honestly? I think if he does even a partial one, it'll be a way to get the press to talk about anything other than his coup.
comment in response to
post
Unsure why this would be predicted on a fair election. Trump cheated to install himself. That shit's fuckin fair game now.
comment in response to
post
These were from the Lakenheath incursions that started around the same time as NJ. Just because someone labels what they saw as a drone, that doesn't make it one. Misidentifications run both ways... Someone can misidentify UAP as drones.
comment in response to
post
TBC. There were absolutely civilian misidentifications of planes and drones at the time... Those aren't the ones I'm interested in. They don't account for what mayors, sheriffs, and the coast guard were reporting.
comment in response to
post
There was also no RF coming from them. Even a satellite would require it for communication with a drone. Whatever they were, they weren't remotely controlled.
comment in response to
post
As for comments, I put more stock into statements from eyewitnesses. People who were actually there, like this Mayor, who had trouble recording video of them within a quarter mile of him.
"Red green, red green"
Watch his hand. He's showing you it was a single light changing colors. An orb.
comment in response to
post
Apologies. I thought you said something about Lue... I must've conflated your comments with someone else's.
comment in response to
post
I hate Elon as much, and maybe a bit more, than the next guy. But there's no indication he's in any way connected to this.
comment in response to
post
Nope. It was IR. There was no indication of jamming, or they would've reported that... Because it WOULD'VE been a huge deal. There was just no heat signature detected at all. Even *lights* on a drone should display a heat signature.
comment in response to
post
Just because they *can* move at hypersonic speeds, that doesn't mean they always will.
Plus Low Observability/Cloaking. That's an observable that can only be seen in person. Its defining characteristic is an inability TO capture data from them... So you won't have data on other observables.
comment in response to
post
It doesn't have to be all 5 at once to be UAP. That would be like arguing a Bugatti only qualifies as one when it's moving at top speed... It's still one when it's parked. Just like an orb hovering in one spot is STILL an orb... you know?
comment in response to
post
Lue's comment about satellites, he was just explaining why they weren't consumer drones from Walmart or Amazon. He didn't say there were actually satellites involved.
comment in response to
post
And it didn't start in November. These things have been *ongoing* since at least 2017, across multiple states.
comment in response to
post
Including Low Observability. The inability to pick up sensor data from them. I don't care how much Elon has, he's not that far.
comment in response to
post
They weren't drones, though. Multiple observables were reported...
comment in response to
post
Would prob be a solid theory, if it didn't ignore the 8 years worth of drone swarms prior to it.
comment in response to
post
As for Republican voters... I think a lot of them are waking up to how badly they fucked up. They aren't all irredeemable. Some are a lost cause for sure... Not all, though. The support for installing trump as a dictator isn't going to be as widespread as you think.
comment in response to
post
If silver linings are all we have right now, might as well try to find them. 😂
Save the country? All day. Systems of government aren't countries. People are what constitute them...
comment in response to
post
Like the pics and videos of him smoking crack? LMAO. THAT wasn't disinfo at all. What's questionable are all the documents that were on there.
comment in response to
post
Wouldn't exactly label that screaming. 🤣
But yeah. There was def evidence of SOME crimes on there... But fucking Giuliani had that bullshit for a YEAR. Whatever's on there isn't admissible in court since it could've easily been tampered with.
comment in response to
post
At the VERY least, we might get more parties out of this shit. A lot of people might no longer be willing to vote for either Dems OR Repubs, considering both enabled this shit for almost a century.
comment in response to
post
The public still matters on this. It affects everyone, dude, even the people we hate. I'm hoping they'll realize the system of government we've had in place SHOULD be burned to the fucking ground, just not replaced with whatever the fuck project 2025 is trying to install.
comment in response to
post
I wasn't a fan of it. 😂
But most people already know what she's about. Her inclusion, while unfortunate as fuck, isn't going to turn people away. They'll just ignore what she had to say.
comment in response to
post
A lot of those people *will* uphold that shit. It's not going to turn out like they hope.
comment in response to
post
ANY kind of disclosure will benefit us in the long run.
And Trump isn't going to be a king. There WILL be civil unrest long before that happens, and not just in the public. It would divide the military, IC, and federal agencies, too. Those people swore oaths to the Constitution, not to him.
comment in response to
post
It's not just Republicans, dude. FFS. And I think you're underselling how much of a change will occur. Not just in public, but across mainstream science and academia. When they KNOW antigravity is a fuckin thing, there's no keeping that genie in the bottle, no matter how much the tech bros try to.
comment in response to
post
"Dog and pony show"
I disagree.
"Brought up ridiculous conspiracy theories"
Outside of fuckin Boebert mentioning flat earth (🤦) during her little opening spiel... Whatcha got?
comment in response to
post
Throwing voices in the trash isn't the way to do this shit, when they're pushing for the same thing you SHOULD want. The cover up to end. Everyone has their own theories about what it is. It's nothing new.
comment in response to
post
"Being taken over by a religious cult"
Even IF that's what they are, who cares? Until they have the evidence in hand to prove their theories, AFTER disclosure, it's just theories. Fuckin Muslims think these things are Djinn... Because of course they do.
comment in response to
post
Hunter Biden laptop? When did he do that?
comment in response to
post
Made a mockery? Explain.
comment in response to
post
Were you ever under the impression that tech WASN'T going to go to benefit the ruling class, regardless of who was in office? 😂
Free energy for ***US*** was never going to be a thing.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sucking up to anyone. I'm not just being a fucking child about this. You should try it. 🙄
comment in response to
post
So cover up for always and forever. Got it. 🫡