Profile avatar
slepkov.bsky.social
Physics prof at the largest small university in Ontario, Canada. Ultrafast lasers, microscopy, microwave photonics, physics education, multiple-choice assessment. Funny is good. A pervert for nuance.
78 posts 553 followers 75 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Seeing the demo, I now assume it is independently-polarized RGB bulbs. Your green is orthogonal to magenta (blue+red).
comment in response to post
I assume(d) that the source is uniformly-polarized white light, and that the polarizing slide in your hand is a 2-layer stack. If so, the order of the layers matters immensely. If, however, the slide in your hand is a simple polarizer, then the light comprises independently-polarized RGB bulbs.
comment in response to post
Tom, I presume that the filter is a stack of two optical elements, the first one (closest to the source) is a wave-plate of sorts or some birefringent film and the backing layer is a linear polarizer. See: doi.org/10.1119/5.00... One question: If you flip the slide over, do the colours disappear?
comment in response to post
This is water at microwave frequencies. With an index of refraction os 9 at 2.5GHz, you get a polarization angle (Brewster's angle) at very shallow angles. This must be relevant to cellphone signals near bodies of water.
comment in response to post
This is important, most of all because the reflected light at grazing angles will be somewhat polarized.
comment in response to post
Is this for 'unpolarized' light?
comment in response to post
This is 6.5 pages long, but lots of it is figures. I think you'll find it appropriate for the sophomore/junior level. doi.org/10.1119/5.00...
comment in response to post
Oh, what fun!
comment in response to post
If flight is the obvious optimal endpoint of locomotion, all land animals would have evolved to fly, and certainly no birds would have lost flight via evolution.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Heck, I would go vegetarian if I was assured a steady supply of dal makhani and any of various Tamil eggplant dishes.
comment in response to post
you got it! It's been years since I've made it. It's going alongside tandoori chicken and dal makhani!
comment in response to post
@physgal.bsky.social Can I please be added to the list? scholar.google.com/citations?us...
comment in response to post
AN HOUR HERE AND THERE in one week?! TO THINK OF SCIENCE?! This must be how the other half lives!
comment in response to post
Congratulations, Mikhail!
comment in response to post
@physgal.bsky.social Hi Sarah, would you please add me to the list(s) as well?
comment in response to post
I couldn't agree more
comment in response to post
That's like $10 worth of pine nuts on one plate. Add caviar, why dontcha?!😝
comment in response to post
too soon
comment in response to post
How about a 3D grid of alternating square cubes of two different inexes? Say, acrylic and glass blocks arranged in alternating 16x16x16 blocks? Direct incidence well imaged, but anything else suffers mild blurring?
comment in response to post
Learning the course material is only marginally more time consuming (but vastly more productive) than mastering ChatGPT as a replacement for learning such content.
comment in response to post
We are about to return to the golden age of oral assessments.
comment in response to post
So, is ice physisorbed water?
comment in response to post
and what does it mean? I'm always confused by the precise transition from physisorption and chemisorption.
comment in response to post
OK, now that you are here to stay, you have to follow me. As per the BARpod rules, you have to follow back any Primo who mentions being a pervert for nuance in their bio. It's your rule; not mine!
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Richard Muller's definition of a scientist: A non-scientist is easily fooled and is particularly vulnerable to self-deception A scientist is easily fooled and is particularly vulnerable to self-deception, and knows it.
comment in response to post
Sorry to hear this. Having had a rough family year myself, I'm hoping your troubles are transient.
comment in response to post
Monk it is, then!