Profile avatar
so3brocktree.bsky.social
🇬🇧 MOD. Royal Navy Strategic Studies Centre. Thoughts & feelings on defence and other things. Not always as serious as I might seem. Views my own. Longer thoughts & feelings on substack: https://crackingdefence.substack.com/
519 posts 423 followers 557 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

EU delivers: Foreign Ministers just approved the 16th package of sanctions against Russia. It hits everything from shadow fleet ships to gaming controllers used to control drones. We now have the most extensive sanctions ever, weakening Russia’s war effort.

A moving article with some beautiful - and harrowing -photography. A reminder that the war is an all-of-society effort for Ukraine.

Saw this yesterday. Absolutely fantastic - wild, punkish, and weird. A great way to adapt Greek tragedy. Go see it if you can.

Clever modular design from British engineers. There is certainly no lack of innovative talent in the UK defence sector.

Strong effort from the Danes 💪🇩🇰💪

This is an exceptional analysis piece by @gideonrachman.bsky.social on the implications of the Trump Administration's stance towards Europe for Europe I want to say it's highly provocative, but I fear it's the basecase. A rupture and realignment, unfolding before us www.ft.com/content/11f1...

Your periodic reminder that these people think of women as disposable objects.

A ludicrous hill to die on. ‘An ally of the Prime Minister told The Telegraph: “The policy we stood on at the election was 2.5 per cent on defence spending. Our policy is still 2.5 per cent. We’re not going to shift any further.”’

This!!!! Focus on outcomes, not inputs.

I will never not stop banging on about this: The conversation needs to shift to 'what outputs do we need' rather than 'how much we spend'. The whole GDP percentage debate is a political distortion which frankly has very little to do with actual defence capability.

Brief thoughts on a European force for Ukraine. I think there is a degree of requirements paralysis. It doesn’t have to be hundreds of thousands of troops, or cover a 1200km contact line. Where it is deployed, and in what role, is more important than the overall size. 1/

Very timely report on Helsing, Europe's main defence start up.

As promised, a discussion of European defence without the USA. Can Europe defend itself alone? How would it? Read to find out...

Great newsletter as always. The 'GDP percentage input' debate has such totemic status that it even dominates discussions in the professional Defence commentariat. Quibbling about 2.3% vs 2.5% vs 2.6% is fundamentally flawed as compared to discussing actual desired effects.

“The French were right” is certainly a comment I have heard more than once over the last few days… #MSC2025

Worth a read. Some very interesting insights.

As promised, a discussion of European defence without the USA. Can Europe defend itself alone? How would it? Read to find out...

A snapshot - completely face-value, but useful as a starter for awareness. ‘European NATO’ includes Türkiye and Greece, which admittedly skews the numbers much higher as both countries have very large stocks of older kit. Chart my own from IISS numbers.

'The assumption still reigns, west of Warsaw, that war is something that happens to other people, a long way away' Fantastic piece by Keir Giles in the FT - I couldn't agree more. I intend to publish my own thoughts on European defence without the US in the coming days.

Europe should have gotten serious a decade ago. It breaks me that people are still shocked that the US is now strategically less interested in Europe, when some form of 'Asia/China focus' has been the stated intention of US foreign policy administrations since at least Obama.

Europe should have gotten serious a decade ago. It breaks me that people are still shocked that the US is now strategically less interested in Europe, when some form of 'Asia/China focus' has been the stated intention of US foreign policy administrations since at least Obama.

Ukraine did not "go into this war“. They were attacked.

"Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general [..] warned members of the European parliament last month that if EU member states do not drastically increase their defence spending, the only options left to them will be to learn Russian or move to New Zealand." A gift Article in the link on.ft.com/41cjdED

How (not) to talk about European security, here’s a primer for all of you going to Munich these days, with thanks to @henninghoff.bsky.social at IPQ. (Based on my upcoming book, see profile.)

Fucking awful. Yet again, another young person failed by the Army. Too often abuse remains unreported or ignored, with fatal consequences. We need to be better than this. There is no excuse.

Bureaucracy, famously not important in war

Good short update on the state of the EW fight. The speed of evolution is dizzying.

Good short update on the state of the EW fight. The speed of evolution is dizzying.

I really, really want to believe this will be an improvement. My experience of Serco services inclines me to be intensely cynical, however. The devil will be in the detail of the contract the MOD has signed.

I wrote about that least-loved of military institutions, the staff, and why you it matters. I'm sure anyone who has worked in a staff headquarters will recognise the stereotypes....

Yes! The Oxford-Cambridge bus service takes on average a painful 4hrs - absolutely ridiculous considering how short the direct distance is between the two cities. Don't forget a new direct train line though - particularly useful for academic to academic travel.

Good morning, in this excellent interview with George Parker, Peter Mandelson shows real commitment to his longtime response to stories he doesn't like on.ft.com/3QrD4JT

Very much worth a read. Kudos to the Economist for getting the interview.

Very much worth a read. Kudos to the Economist for getting the interview.

With everything else going on in the world, the protests in Serbia haven't been covered much. This is a great overview:

Man, someone should write a book about staffs.

I wrote about that least-loved of military institutions, the staff, and why you it matters. I'm sure anyone who has worked in a staff headquarters will recognise the stereotypes....

Good, but should have happened ages ago.