Profile avatar
sorcafa.bsky.social
428 posts 208 followers 81 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
oh so you're just an open fascist then. cool
comment in response to post
lab grown meat isn't vegan (www.greenqueen.com.hk/is-lab-grown...) so presumably this isn't either. also the concept is disgusting anyway unless you grew up being told it wasn't lol
comment in response to post
bothsidesing a vicious genocide, nice
comment in response to post
discord is a good chatroom and an awful forum
comment in response to post
it's true. you wouldn't give the tiniest shit as she continued genociding palestinians, encouraging police brutality and stomping on workers
comment in response to post
true democrats love double tap drone strikes
comment in response to post
get lost
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
you must really enjoy being a caricature of the dumbest people alive
comment in response to post
PPP has nothing to do with housing. Source your claim. it is in fact regressive to bean count food stamps while not touching any of the million ways the rich avoid taxes and the like. you don't know what you are talking about, shockingly
comment in response to post
that's a regressive adjustment which is the opposite of what actually matters. imagine beancounting food stamps while pretending it's fine to not have to take paying rent into account. every supporter of your insane ideology is stupid, amoral and delusional
comment in response to post
transfers in kind are the opposite of what we are talking about. there would be no need to 'adjust for' anything if the people collecting the statistics were interested in actually calculating disposable income. instead they're completely ignoring everything relevant. nice useless stats, good talk
comment in response to post
(1) no it doesn't. by median they are second. (2) you failed to understand a word of my last post. (3) 'disposable income' is defined in such a way as to not mean disposable income, just income minus taxes. Including necessary expenses like housing, car costs etc things could be rather different.
comment in response to post
no it isn't. america's problem is that the rich are very rich and the poor are very poor. knowing that, taking the mean for any statistic is moronic. obviously the US is all about making cheap low quality treats widely available. $2 crisps aren't very relevant when you're living in your car, though
comment in response to post
thanks for the next installment in 'facts from an alternate dimension where up is down'. your country is an anti-worker shithole where no one gets paid anything except the top few percent. your sources are lying or simply comparing with even worse examples, if that's somehow possible
comment in response to post
i also love spouting non sequiturs rather than reflecting on my dogshit failed ideology
comment in response to post
are you insane? you do understand that 'employment rates' are an incredibly gamed statistic for entirely political reasons, right? anyone who thinks they represent the percentage of people being paid a living wage is a moron, especially in a country where two jobs sometimes aren't enough
comment in response to post
99.9% actually
comment in response to post
i would prefer not to answer my emails than to outsource the job to a bullshitting machine. if everyone uses a shitty program to read and send all their emails what is the fucking point, its just an extension of facebook bots talking to facebook bots
comment in response to post
a basic understanding of geopolitics would have easily allowed you to avoid this particular rake
comment in response to post
this is actually fascinating because the 'pure ideology' you speak of is the ideology of maximising material gain. you're doubly dumb and wrong; impressive
comment in response to post
your politics are moronic and abhorrent
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Approved for immediate release in all media
comment in response to post
charlie brown had hoes