sourmushsoup.bsky.social
Moving here from Twitter, under the same name. @SourMushroomSoup on AO3, check me out!
Fanart (mostly Trigun atm), doodles, all that. I like and may retweet NSFW, so beware!
#trigun | #oc | more coming, probably
108 posts
39 followers
89 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Maybe I just haven’t put enough thought into the games, but what are the monokubs commenting on socially I do NOT understand (genuine question btw, not trying to be mean!)
comment in response to
post
And these bitches got the nerve to tell me I’m not doing the dishes fast enough. Girl What
comment in response to
post
Anyway, im rambling. My point is that Jayvik can be canon while also “letting men have healthy platonic relationships”, because Jayvik specifically is far from platonic, no matter how you spin it
comment in response to
post
which cishets tend to ignore in favor of the more simple line of logic: “everyone thinks that this relationship is gay just because it’s loving”.
comment in response to
post
To clarify: a lot of ppl assume that the reason some ppl ship yaoi ships is bc they subscribe to the heteronormative idea that the presence of love of any kind in male relationships is enough to make said relationship gay, +
comment in response to
post
overlooking all the ways that the relationship could be seen as romantic by assuming that everyone calling it romantic is talking about the healthy aspects of any platonic relationship, as the default is, again, femininity + men = gay. +
comment in response to
post
while many queers (correctly) argue that that alone doesn’t make a relationship romantic. In other words, cishets tend to assume that they’re breaking a stereotype by creating a healthy platonic relationship between two men in media (which they are, in many ways), but then
comment in response to
post
softness and tenderness exists in the relationship. Those are grounds for healthy relationships, both romantic and platonic, but so many cishet ppl seem to assume that the presence of these (traditionally) feminine traits in a man-to-man relationship is enough to make it homosexual
comment in response to
post
Which I think is where the idea comes from that “men can never just have a healthy friendship without the queers turning it gay,” because it assumes that the reason many queer ppl see the relationship as gay is because +
comment in response to
post
Most can agree that romance includes softness and tenderness, and stereotypical those traits are associated with femininity, but most ppl subscribing to heteronormative ideas also assume that femininity + man = gay +