spaceodyssey1.bsky.social
Curious space lover who is intrigued by all things spacey
244 posts
135 followers
40 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
He didn't say they would not be British. He said, "Would they truly feel British
He used Pakistan citizenship as an example
comment in response to
post
Ahh good old claire blocked me, because she was challenged
comment in response to
post
Sorry, what do you mean check your privilege ?
Besides that point that I didn't know, my point stays the same.
Also, you need to be careful of cognitive dissonance.
Maybe it's not misinformation. Maybe it's because you don't like truth or the reality if it
Pride yourself on being wrong sometimes
comment in response to
post
These points are still valid wht he isn't a fascist in the truth, sense if the word.
comment in response to
post
Won't concede he is a fascist
comment in response to
post
Sorry, I never knew he pardoned them
comment in response to
post
Trump encouraged supporters on Jan 6, but there’s no proof he ordered the riot. No rioters murdered anyone, though people died. He tried to overturn the election through false fraud claims. He didn’t pardon Jan 6 rioters, though he’s suggested he might if reelected. The full fascism claim is opinion
comment in response to
post
The ACA rollback affected millions, not just trans people. Trump did roll back trans protections (military ban, Title IX changes), but genocide means mass extermination, not legal exclusion. Nazi comparisons should be used carefully if we want a serious discussion
comment in response to
post
Let's be clear here.
He did not establish a one-party state or abolish elections.
His policies, while controversial, fit within a right-wing populist framework rather than full fascism.
He lacked the centralized control and ideological coherence of historical fascist leaders
Not into hyperbole
comment in response to
post
He did not establish a one-party state or abolish elections.
His policies, while controversial, fit within a right-wing populist framework rather than full fascism.
He lacked the centralized control and ideological coherence of historical fascist leaders.
There you go pal,
comment in response to
post
Trump's first executive order targeted the Affordable Care Act, not trans rights. He did roll back protections (military ban, Title IX changes), but calling it genocide or comparing it to Nazi Germany is false. Losing legal protections isn’t systematic extermination. Stick to facts, not hyperbole.
comment in response to
post
Me I did
comment in response to
post
Though time dilation halts the fall, effects like gravity change as the object nears the horizon.
comment in response to
post
I totally understand your question
But to an external observer, we don't see objects going in but see the effects of it in a black hole example getting larger.
Maybe talk to A.i more deeply
comment in response to
post
Also, thank you for responding. I hope this read friendly and politely
Just a curious guy who seeks truth and chocolate 🍫
comment in response to
post
If I have an idea that I believe is true, I want other experts to prove to disprove my theory, not lambast me or expell me from the field
Doesn't seem very scientific
I don't know who is right or wrong, just a minefield for people who want to learn about such an amazing subject
comment in response to
post
I don't have a side, BTW
Both sides and followers have not done the science of archaeology, a good service
I think yourself making condescending videos, labelling people seeking truth, pseudo archaeologists as helped
If Graham is wrong smash his points out with science and known fact
comment in response to
post
The debate on joe rogan was horrible. I was thinking this can't be two experts debating
There is a lot of mocking going on from both sides of followers, the name calling of pseudo science. Or being called a liar
Am just old-fashioned, stick to the known facts, and prove them
Be Scientific
comment in response to
post
To say anyone faked cancer when they had cancer is unescusable.
comment in response to
post
Hi, guys I've been reading this whole thread, and I'm so disappointed. It seems very personal, don't be personal if your truth is the truth. Debate it. Stick up for it.
There are people in this group who are doctors and academics calling them names isn't a good look. Beat them with truth fact proof
comment in response to
post
So are you saying scientists should not debate ?
Scientists debate all the time. Why should this be different? Are you going to block people for asking questions when you give them information?
If you are positive, you are correct. Always stick up for it always
comment in response to
post
I dont understand what the issue is. Are you saying these guys have no rights to fact-check what you are saying?
Seems like you were the first one to be personal, and they have researched your responses from your interview,
If what you are saying is accurate, there is no need to worry