stacejam.bsky.social
88 posts
70 followers
115 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Boo.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, his name is Donald Trump. "you won't have it as bad" is not the same as "this won't affect you". As long as the US president has the power to tank the entire world's economy, the entire world get's an opinion.
comment in response to
post
It's not some magical wonderland, the have people living below the poverty line. A welfare state doesn't fund itself, and it's not going to stop people losing their homes.
comment in response to
post
It's called a global recession for a reason.
comment in response to
post
An intern?
comment in response to
post
I don’t know how this is so hard. They’re acting dishonestly and deceiving people. Look at any post of there’s and there’s people who are buying what they’re saying. There is no good movement that can be built on deceiving comrades. What they’re doing is awful and cruel.
comment in response to
post
Oh for gods sake. No you weren’t. You’re a world power, have a vastly over weighted influence on culture, are an extremely popular travel destination. This was *after* a Trump presidency.
comment in response to
post
They’re not either of those things, that’s the entire point. If you can’t see how people offering false hope to the hopeless is a bad thing, that’s a *you* problem.
comment in response to
post
And if we were talking about them reposting memes you would have a point.
comment in response to
post
That’s not the same thing. If they were reposting that would be credit. They’re pretending like they’re getting the information from inside sources, where in fact it’s some underpaid independent journo.
comment in response to
post
They can do all of that without presenting a false front and pretending that they are some sort of authoritative source. They’re regurgitating the work of others without credit.
comment in response to
post
Come on, you’re being deliberately obtuse. There is a very clear distinction between “here is a thing I made” and “I am an ex federal employee and member of the resistance, would you like to buy some merch”.
comment in response to
post
Oh horseshit. There are plenty of incredibly decent people who are fighting with everything they have . This is cruel, misanthropic and unhelpful. Grow up.
comment in response to
post
Begging New Zealanders to stop making their nationality so prominent if they’re going to be dicks. Say you’re from Eritrea or something.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Everyone is in a no-win situation. The idea isn’t to avoid criticism - she could do that by keeping her mouth shut. The idea is to do the right thing, which is call for a ceasefire. But she hasn’t and she won’t.
comment in response to
post
You know we’re on the same internet, right? Because of course I used Google, which is how I know you’re lying. What I can’t figure out is why. People hate this woman already, why would you make such a half-assed defence of her?
comment in response to
post
So…no you can’t. Because she never has, and you didn’t actually confirm that before saying it.
comment in response to
post
Can you point to an instance of her defending Palestinians?
comment in response to
post
When you’re still fundraising for the IDF and organising propaganda screeners in your late 30s, the “mandatory service” line becomes a little weak.
comment in response to
post
He’s also wearing bracelets in the colour of the flag, I guess in case a photo agency decides to “accidentally” edit out the badge again.
comment in response to
post
You know what would make the fact checking easy? If they shared the info from sources they’re cribbing without credit. But then they couldn’t lie about it coming from exclusive inside sources. They’re exploiting the people doing the *actual* work, there’s nothing progressive about it.
comment in response to
post
Do you have any examples?
comment in response to
post
They regurgitate information from people who have actual sources, and say “we’ve heard” up front to make it seem like it’s their info. I haven’t seen any evidence that this account has provided any information first hand.
comment in response to
post
Why are people assuming this was written by Musk et al and not an unfriendly 3rd party? They’re clearly saying “this is how you can technically obey while giving them nothing at all.”
comment in response to
post
Just to be clear, your opinion is that sometimes sexism is fine?
comment in response to
post
There’s no such thing as misogyny for the greater good. Sexism is still just as sexist when it’s directed at republicans.
comment in response to
post
I'm still unreasonably mad about that. Chickenshit. The no-controversy answer is "you, Rove!".
comment in response to
post
Does she know about “hostel”?
comment in response to
post
Oh great, here comes more nepo baby discourse.
comment in response to
post
Hope this helps!
comment in response to
post
Yes.
comment in response to
post
So you’re saying that only people under 10 know who he is, but no one under 25 knows who he is. What kind of bridge troll riddle is this, Peter?
comment in response to
post
You alright there?
comment in response to
post
Have you taken leave of your senses?
comment in response to
post
Big help that was!
comment in response to
post
I'm confused, did someone force you into this discussion?
comment in response to
post
Rough out there for any male Taylors after 2008ish.
comment in response to
post
You can judge my taint too, you pair of sanctimonious tools. Enjoy your little circle jerk, you’re so much better than everyone else!
comment in response to
post
Oh I intend to.
comment in response to
post
It wasn’t, and even if it was the intent was to be a prick, not to present valid criticism. Which I imagine you’re gearing up to do yourself, so you can save your breath.
comment in response to
post
This is a very normal occurrence for large scale disasters.
comment in response to
post
Judge my taint.
comment in response to
post
I understood, I’m not thick. You just came in like an asshole, so I reacted in kind. You didn’t want to criticise, you wanted you be a judgey dick. Mission accomplished.
comment in response to
post
Oh my bad for not reacting to the above, and instead replying to what you actually said. I lost my psychic powers due to meat eating.
comment in response to
post
Valid criticism my ass. You made a sarcastic remark. You weren’t even trying to be constructive. I took it in exactly the spirit in which it was intended.
comment in response to
post
That’s the attitude that will win hearts and minds! Jk you don’t care about that, you just want to feel superior.
comment in response to
post
No it’s not. It’s a reasonable way to get people to reduce their impact on the planet, and to experiment with plant based foods without making a major dietary change all at once.
comment in response to
post
Reducing the amount of animal product you consume. Could not have been clearer about that.