stelek.bsky.social
204 posts
37 followers
15 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
That's not accurate. Trump created y, Biden created x. Trumps were negative. They will be again imho. Bidens were positive.
comment in response to
post
I agree but that's a congress issue.
comment in response to
post
Actually in the US and just the US, no one can own land.
comment in response to
post
How so?
comment in response to
post
Hmm I think it's an impossible dream to build one.
comment in response to
post
Dictator playbook 101.
comment in response to
post
Seems spot on lol.
comment in response to
post
Didn't this happen last time? Why does it need to be litigated, again?
comment in response to
post
Fascinating stuff.
comment in response to
post
Yeah that's pretty messed up. :(
comment in response to
post
AI doesn't exist.
comment in response to
post
The rich and powerful, on both sides of the aisle, are out of touch. They don't need to be in touch. We don't count.
comment in response to
post
I can follow you here. I don't do Facebook/Instagram/Meta.
comment in response to
post
Yeah that sucks.
comment in response to
post
Yes. They'd nuke Washington in September when everyone is there and declare Martial Law. Duh.
comment in response to
post
If we both talk it out, maybe we can figure out what, if anything, the problem is. I'm not worried about immigration, I'm worried about cultural integration. Which means a slow steady trickle of newcomers into the US. America is a great place to come to. Just not all at once, we can't absorb it.
comment in response to
post
The funny thing is, I think they're far-right. But I posted it because every single sentence has an accurate attribution of where it came from. There are no opinions there without facts shown.
comment in response to
post
Natural gas, why do we want to stop supplying it the UK? Should they freeze to death instead? The war in Ukraine is why we're sending them natural gas, yes? What does stopping it do for us? Is your natural gas 5x more expensive because of it or something? Prices went down under Biden?
comment in response to
post
I live where the feds own tons of land. Why do we need to drill more? We're a net exporter of gas and oil. Do we want or need to blow up all the forests so we can produce far more than Saudi Arabia? We're already number 1, and they are number 2.
comment in response to
post
Not jumping around, there's a character limit and I want to say more than yes/no. I'm not sure what you want me to say about the border wall. Biden messed up and didn't close the border, but Trump interfered with Congress and they let him block a good border deal. That's bad.
comment in response to
post
14.6 million jobs created under Biden first 3 years. Trump lost 2.7 million jobs. Did other jobs get lost? Yes, but as a country we have to look at the total jobs created.
comment in response to
post
You are misinformed. They didn't say suppress the right. They said the hunter biden laptop story was russian disinformation. Which it was. He is a drug user, a big doofus with poor judgement, and ultimately--who cares? We have lots of drug using doofii.
comment in response to
post
Not reliable? Well fortunately what tech spiders do gathering information across the internet google has been unable to produce a model that stifles information. That would be China, and they suck at it too. Is Google a monopoly? Yep. Should be broken up. Should have been. Decade ago.
comment in response to
post
2/2 As far as having national guardsmen with rifles goes, they aren't trained for and suck at policing. Look at the airport, where they walk around and do nothing. Everyone who broke in, and that means, entered the building during the riot--is and will forever be a traitor.
comment in response to
post
1/2 Evidence where? Please show evidence. As far as Jan 6 goes, Trump Pelosi and Bowser all requested National guard troops. Who showed up hours later. Bud, do we really want national guardsmen with rifles guarding the capitol at any point? I say no.
comment in response to
post
As far as Ricky goes, you can read what he was convicted of. The thing Trump insists only Dems do, but it's just maga who keeps breaking voting laws. Maybe don't break the law for views? That idiot who jumped out of his plane got his too. harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...
comment in response to
post
I don't think the democrats are censoring anyone. Right now, since I only use bluesky, I don't think the republicans are censoring me. They seem to be censoring federal employees.
comment in response to
post
No there isn't. There wasn't one at the last election. They can avoid reality for 4 fucking years.
comment in response to
post
Doubtful. Age will get him first.
comment in response to
post
Oh and for the record, I think Musk is a pathetic cuck. He bought our government (thanks Citizens United, thanks Supreme Cucks) and has gained hundreds of billions of dollars in value spending 300 million to do it. He's an idiot, a fool, the worse of humanity at a time when we need the best.
comment in response to
post
I'm also baffled by the force of extremist agendas. Do you mean creating jobs? I saw a lot of that. I never see that when Republicans are in power. Just a historical fact, you can google it. Do you mean EV? Windmills? What, pray tell, is an extremist agenda from Biden, Mr. boring himself? 😇
comment in response to
post
Which companies did the government go after, please. Provide facts. Lawsuits successfully won by companies defending their rights to fleece the everliving fuck out of us. Please, explain with science, facts, a court record--anything but using the force to show me, ok?
comment in response to
post
You may not realize this, but you appear to be in a small room that believes the DOJ did a disservice by prosecuting Jan 6 traitors and the Trumps. I'm not in that room with you, I'm outside in the clear blue sky, but I can help you get out. The only disservice the DOJ did was not jailing Trump.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure what control over speech exists. Do you mean, Elon Musk purchasing Twitter and turning it into an anti-democracy platform? Or do you mean some sort of bluetooth nanite giving government control over what I say? I'm here on blue because I can say what I want here. Within the law.
comment in response to
post
Allright, alot of effort. Let's start with mainstream media. Eight corporations control the vast majority. They aren't controlled by the federal government, or any former democratic presidents. In fairness, they aren't owned by any republican presidents either. Fox is owned by Murdoch.
comment in response to
post
Did you experience this at the federal level under Biden? Obama? Clinton? Can you give examples, since I've never experienced or witnessed anything like it. No, I don't care what California or New York do. Federal level authoritarianism under the dems, please. Like what is going on, well, now.
comment in response to
post
Stop saying uphold until they make a decision that is:
A) Not an open loophole for a different challenge.
B) Actually upholds the law entirely, not 'punt' the issue so they can reverse course when it's politically savvy to do so.
comment in response to
post
Oh, I see. You do know Stalin equals Communism equals far-left and Hitler equals Nazism equals far-right, yes? Those traitors we currently have in office are saluting using the:
A) Stalin Salute, making them far-left reps.
B) Hitler Seig Heil, making them far-right reps.
Which is it?
comment in response to
post
The left isn't doing what the Nazis did. The orange traitor in chief is. Not sure why it's confusing. I'll give you an example. Poland = Greenland. Make more sense, or still no?
comment in response to
post
You aren't a nobody. You have the same vote as everyone else. The power of one. :)
comment in response to
post
1/1 I don't see the left being militaristic, authoritarian, expansionist, or particularly hateful. If you believe I am a huge fan of the democratic party, I am not. It's the only party remaining. It has many issues. I'd rather not be executed by Maga traitors, so here I am, explaining the obv.
comment in response to
post
1/1 I find your lack of comprehension disturbing. I don't care what who said. He's a youtuber, about as useless as they come. What I do care about is what political scientists explain things as, and the Nazis are far-right.
comment in response to
post
Is she saying she's a woman? Or a traitor? Both? Do I care if she's a woman? No. Do I care if she's a traitor? Yes.
End result: More maga nonsense from a traitor.
comment in response to
post
Also, the contract will just be voided. What are we gonna do? We won't fight now. We won't fight then.
comment in response to
post
The poor don't count for the top 1% is the problem. I wonder how hot those fires of hell burn, eh?
comment in response to
post
Rand Paul is a piece of worthless shit. Always has been.
comment in response to
post
Think he got a Goldenes Parteiabzeichen before getting the boot?
comment in response to
post
Bet you 500 pesos those cops get reassigned or fired. Not allowed to touch the Nazi party faithful, broskis.
comment in response to
post
Who will be doing cock and ball inspections? Are we all going to line up? Please explain how this is done for the women without being disgusting. I'm a man, I've done enough turn and coughs--and my stuff is outside my body. packaged-media.redd.it/6cg7dassom6c...
comment in response to
post
Traitor. Coward. Rapist. Felon.