Profile avatar
stephenmj.bsky.social
535 posts 51 followers 30 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
perhaps it could be called "the edge of the uncanny desert "
comment in response to post
my gut instinct - given only some generalized description of the theoretical construction of various kinds of AIs, and otherwise treating what goes on in their detailed operations, it should be provable mathematically that there is a complexity threshold and one, probably lower, based on novelty
comment in response to post
if no human has ever put together the sentence A B C, does the design of LLMs allow one to construct that sentence? it seems to me that the output of LLMs must, mathematically, be deeply shallow, based as they are on frequency of word adjacency, not meaning, of published sentences and paragraphs.
comment in response to post
entropy?
comment in response to post
a bridge too far
comment in response to post
Does it matter if you save to computer instead of cloud?
comment in response to post
Who will bear responsibility?
comment in response to post
What about Lexis’ Protége? Slow, unreliable, clunky interface, good grammar. What was it built on? Little use to serious litigators
comment in response to post
consistent with the naive notion that labs don't need people, much less intelligent scientists, since if you generate enough electricity from fossil fuels and invest in AI research, computers can do everything - jobs will become hobbies and somehow the US will be able to support the few right people
comment in response to post
a pattern of mistakes that has not been fixed despite knowledge that it violates court orders constitutes either deliberate violation of the orders or such gross incompetence as to disqualify the agency from functioning in any respect as a lawful arm of the govt
comment in response to post
What’s the reaction?
comment in response to post
Will you tell your students students how their performances compare with the Llm?
comment in response to post
imo there is no way to preserve privilege or confidentiality regardless whether it is an llm available to the public or one sold at a high price to law firms. security of data these days should be proven before use, particularly by a program so little understood and controlled
comment in response to post
is it multiple choice, yes or no, essay? form makes a difference. if you want to do some research a) run same prompt several times b) vary prompt to more like naive student and more like a nuance aware professor c) compare all results to the decisions and legal writings you relied on for exam;tally
comment in response to post
which country will first produce an AI that is completely beyond human control? will the movie precede the event? will anybody listen?
comment in response to post
not all preemptions are constitutional
comment in response to post
let's be clear - any moratorium which clears the decade for use of ai for criminal purposes, vendettas, stalking, character assassination, theft, electoral tampering, invasion of privacy, etc is not just a terrible law but itself a criminal act (aiding etc), and possibly unconstitutional
comment in response to post
adoration is not adoration even if low tech ai thinks it is and old eyes miss the techgoof
comment in response to post
the law used to have embedded a basic sense of decency driven by the realization that broad careless mistreatment for some today could of others, including those e know, tomorrow. For too long governments have enjoyed too many passes for cruel and unusual treatment -- it has become cruel and usual
comment in response to post
between adoration chaos and covid "guidance" it is not a great time to be pregnant or not be pregnant. hardly a stable, reliable, or welcoming environment
comment in response to post
What about the tangles where species trade or incorporate genes from other species?
comment in response to post
That’s the point: endless string cites to non-reproduceable responses make value de minimis. Only citing one of the infinite or unpredictable number of possible responses makes its value unknowable. LLM AI does not at this time filter responses for accuracy; when it does, sh filter be in cite?
comment in response to post
Ever had the feeling that infinite complexity and variability gets out of hand? Consider the conscientious law review or brief writer who tries each of six prompts six times each in three different AI LLMs, and cites all (with parenthetical quotes from results) plus a quasi statistical analysis.
comment in response to post
Violates Recods Act
comment in response to post
perhaps there need to be checks and balances on the checks and balances, or alternatively, we need to reconsider our traditional faith in the c&b provisions in our constitution
comment in response to post
Where in the constitution is the president given the power to determine what is true?
comment in response to post
Would appreciate if all such stories about reversal included the cost of the whole process
comment in response to post
Interesting. Quaere: Does this represent a description of what code does? Or is the manual itself what Claude “refers to” (as text) every time it responds to a prompt?
comment in response to post
Nb - word is unpredictable about including dashes and hyphens and people sometimes use the dashes solo. What caught my eye in the selection was that it seemed wordy, repetitive and unedited. BUT that’s a matter of opinion
comment in response to post
can sale of indulgences be next?
comment in response to post
Technically, this is probably right. Being president is not a 9-5 job; he/she is always on call, if not on state business. But it has not been codified. Perhaps it & the emoluments clause should be memorialized in legislation - but not w this Congress and SCOTUS. After the end of this dark age, …
comment in response to post
What’s the fine print? Whose white elephant will this be? whose albatross?
comment in response to post
And a grift manual
comment in response to post
Is there a budget line for this “free” plane? Given that the plane was a white elephant until T agreed to take it off their hands, is it really worth $400 after depreciation, age, retrofit, security costs are considered?
comment in response to post
If Trump has any interest in the plane, even if contingent or delayed, not only is the gift barred, someone should pay gift tax on it
comment in response to post
This is a relative of destruction of evidence, but maliciously worse.
comment in response to post
creating mud pies is and isn't innovative high tech
comment in response to post
Does anyone have standing to object in court?
comment in response to post
Some of those poets (who write in English or have translated their own work into English) should consider submitting work to the New Croton Review newcrotonreview.com. No fee; no geographic limits. Read NCR online to check us out.
comment in response to post
Where was the federal warning & preparatory response? Did DOGE make “efficiency” a priority over lives?
comment in response to post
a settlement is not a win
comment in response to post
lawyers have had to clean up after automated assistance- sometimes traditional legal searches of a cite can't find it; spell check has introduced some whoppers and missed some human errors. they have also had to clean up after themselves - miscopied citation; failure to read case completely; no sh…
comment in response to post
Can AI “discern” tacit knowledge when it is never explicitly written about? Does AI hallucinate tacit knowledge? If both, how predictable is each outcome? Finally, tacit knowledge can be different for different people - can AI “discern” the subtleties and the implications of the differences?
comment in response to post
City walls?
comment in response to post
Did it really end (whether or not “era” is attached) with the fall of the Soviet Union? Is the difficulty with Russia today disconnected from and not a part of the Cold War?
comment in response to post
My suspicion is that the definition depended on the use - propaganda, news and headlines, history, economics, military strategizing - as well as the time and country of use. As far as history, the definition is intertwined with whether you believe it is over.
comment in response to post
essentially two very different options: 1) add to Wikipedia entry a discussion of the history of the rivalry, with supporting sources not written by you, see wha editors do; 2) publish an academic article on the historiography of the rivalry and the history of misinformation about the buildings
comment in response to post
argument that it only applies to emancipated slaves has history backwards. The wording starts “no person…” The provision recognized former slaves & children as “persons” - humans. Had drafters intended birthright only for “emancipated persons” they would have said so. & could have done by statute