stevebroach.bsky.social
Public law silk @ 39 Essex Chambers
Youth coach @ Seaford Town FC
20 posts
1,007 followers
283 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
If the objective were to create work for lawyers, this would be an excellent idea.
The real problem here must be that interventions lacking in evidence should never be in section F of an EHCP as they are not reasonably required
comment in response to
post
ALLFIE’s Inclusive Education Conference 2024 was a memorable event!
Marking 10 years of the Children and Families Act, @stevebroach.bsky.social explained how Disabled people and families can advocate for mainstream education using the Act.
Watch on playback:
youtu.be/BNXhvwxaMdc?...
🧵2/12
comment in response to
post
Webinar incoming - details to follow…
comment in response to
post
Would be great if this was a day celebrating all the different types of pulse-based curry
comment in response to
post
Salt Bae would improve the PMB Ballot imho
comment in response to
post
It’s relatively simple to challenge this one, because a disabled child would be eligible for legal aid and it could well be appropriate for judicial review with the child as claimant
comment in response to
post
Have you tried Root? We are addicted at the moment (it’s best with the expansion pack imho)
comment in response to
post
Big fan of Gresham Blake
comment in response to
post
Can confirm
comment in response to
post
Considering ‘Permanently addicted to messy drama and ragebait’ as my new profile strapline
comment in response to
post
Prospects of success? Your guess is as good as mine mate
comment in response to
post
Here’s the cover, which is what your brain looks like when trying to understand (a) the requirements on decision makers and (b) why you have, yet again, signed up to be part of creating a law book
comment in response to
post
Straight from the tortured poets department