stismail.bsky.social
Former Nutmegger. Chemistry major and science nerd. Educator. Classical music lover. Patriots/Celtics/UConn fan.
"Judge less. Read more." —Kate Good
1,705 posts
758 followers
284 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The Kentucky legislature isn't passing that law.
comment in response to
post
"Next: 3 think pieces on what the Reform Party thinks about requests to provide more coverage of Lib Dems and Greens."
comment in response to
post
Given the Favre trajectory, too.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Hating on trans people and immigrants was more important to too many Americans.
comment in response to
post
For values of "Dems" including "a couple of random idiots who claim to be Dems."
comment in response to
post
That and/or you'll find the Julian Edelmans.
comment in response to
post
The cross country runner is CT who filed a suit over having to compete against transgender girls actually beat said girls in a meet. . . .
comment in response to
post
TBH the long-term answer isn't forgiveness, but vastly reducing/replacing interest. (E.g., simple interest or an admin fee)
comment in response to
post
Other than size they haven't really needed to change for about 25 million years or so, so, yeah.
comment in response to
post
The most spherical natural object ever measured is the Sun.
comment in response to
post
Cats are fluids.
comment in response to
post
Having been there (though not this year), yeah, I'm pretty sure it is.
comment in response to
post
I like this. My version: "Reality took him to the cleaners when it filed for divorce."
comment in response to
post
Assholes catching strays, though.
comment in response to
post
GOP: propose a bill mandating at least 35% of energy come from coal
comment in response to
post
What did he do now?
comment in response to
post
IMO, the fact that several of the Ivys are so generous is partly responsible for the rise in applications, and I don't consider that a bad thing.
comment in response to
post
I believe Popehat's law still applies here.
comment in response to
post
I suspect chairs are . . . too tight for him.
comment in response to
post
Once again @smod4real.bsky.social disappoints:
"However, the powers that be better hurry, as researchers predict that co-orbital asteroids’ orbits could become unpredictable in just more than 150 years — a blip in the interstellar timescale."
comment in response to
post
And yet there are people who would struggle at this.
comment in response to
post
A *very conservative* judge, who presumably wanted to be replaced by a competent conservative, not an idjit that Tr*mp would nominate or a liberal that Biden would nominate. . . .
comment in response to
post
*have caused
comment in response to
post
But Biden was *old.* 🙄
comment in response to
post
Because they have been convinced that ish like banning trans people from the military somehow improves their lives, while things like clean water and a living wage don't.
comment in response to
post
Ugh. He's nobody's favorite, and saying that about the word woke is purely parroting GOP talking points.
Why is he letting the GOP set the terms? FFS.
Yes, there are things that need to change, but the answer is not to become more like Republicans.
comment in response to
post
I believe in anti-ossification limits (e.g., on the order of 24 years in either chamber or 30 years total), but I am vehemently opposed to anything below 18 total.
comment in response to
post
Because as a head of state sometimes you have to meet politely with people you'd rather punch in the mouth.
comment in response to
post
Slugs just wanna have a good time, too. (And they're hermaphrodites.)
comment in response to
post
Absolutely correct
comment in response to
post
The Coke is your writing partner? Seems legit.
comment in response to
post
Not sure about that but the first page of "All Things Bright and Beautiful" has "arm" and "cow" in the same sentence. . . .
comment in response to
post
That happened because McConnell gummed up the works on district and appellate judges.
comment in response to
post
Why not a double-ass company?
comment in response to
post
Yeah, the PSA count. Part of the problem is that PSA levels can also be elevated by *benign* prostate growth, and that condition happens in the majority of men above age 70.
comment in response to
post
Even Pontiac's Aztek wasn't this bad of a flop.
comment in response to
post
It is. It was also the title of a play about Fiorello LaGuardia.
comment in response to
post
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recom...
comment in response to
post
No, actually. The recommendation is to stop at 70 because it tends to be so high at that age even in healthy men that the risks from the tests/treatments (biopsies, etc.) generally outweigh the benefits.
comment in response to
post
Remember the 2020 primary debates? Basically every time M4A came up, the *only* thing was moderators trying to get some Dem to say the magic (truthful) words that it would take an increase in taxes to accomplish, even if people would save money on premiums.
comment in response to
post
Evergreen graphic.
bsky.app/profile/stis...